His immediate resignation and surrender to the civil authorities either in Italy or Argentina would be more relevant.
NorthMountain:
Well I think he should go, but charges, not sure he has committed any Crime. The issues with McCarrick which Vagano speak of refer to him involved with Homosexual relations with seminarians and priests, not a crime, but gravely immoral. The accusation of McCarrick and the sexual abuse of the 16 year old occurred (allegedly) in 1971. Francis to his credit stripped McCarrick from title of Cardinal and put him into what is in effect Catholic prison. I don’t think McCarrick can be charged for something that occurred in 1971 legally. Now, it seems obvious that if Benedict put McCarrick in Catholic house rest for his homosexual relations with adult seminarians and Francis removed him from Catholic time out, it suggest Francis did this to spite Benedict, did not believe the accusations that McCarrick used his position as Seminary Professor to seek out homosexual relations with Seminarians and young priests or He just does not care that MCarrick was an active homosexual involved with other seminarians and priests who were also active homosexuals.