Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Defense Budget Shifts Military's Focus From Terrorism To China And Russia
NPR ^ | Aug 2018 | David Welna

Posted on 08/30/2018 9:45:47 AM PDT by CondoleezzaProtege

The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 was enacted this month well ahead of a still-pending budget bill. It was also the earliest date on the legislative calendar that the NDAA has been sent to a president for his signature in more than two decades.

Congress matched dollar-for-dollar what the Pentagon asked for.

The bill sped through Congress as the nation's military continues waging war in Afghanistan, Syria, Yemen, Iraq, Niger, Libya, Somalia and an untold number of other global hot spots. All arise from what's been the Pentagon's main post-Sept. 11 focus: fighting terrorism.

But this new NDAA reflects Defense Secretary Jim Mattis' pivot away from those prolonged and inconclusive battles with insurgencies, to what he says should be the Pentagon's main concern: the United States' growing competition with the world's two other great powers, Russia and China.

(Excerpt) Read more at npr.org ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Government; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: budget; china; defense; dod; mattis; russia; terrorism
China

The White House prevailed in its quest to exclude from the NDAA language approved by the full Senate blocking the sale of American technology to Chinese telecommunications giant ZTE.

Such a trade restriction had already been imposed by the Trump administration, but it was lifted after Trump spoke with Chinese President Xi Jinping and tweeted that he was looking for a way to get ZTE back in business because "[t]oo many jobs in China [were] lost."

The final NDAA does nothing specific to restrict the sale of American technology to ZTE and Huawei, another Chinese telecommunications and video surveillance giant. But it does tighten overall U.S. national security reviews of American exports of sensitive technology by issuing stricter guidelines for the Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S., or CFIUS.

The NDAA also bars the purchase or use by the federal government and its contractors of technology sold by ZTE and Huawei. That restriction would not, however, apply for sales to the general public.

There is also a ban in the bill on Pentagon spending for any Chinese language instruction provided by the Confucius Institute, which is operated by an entity associated with China's education ministry.

Russia

Mattis also prevailed in dissuading Congress from requiring enforcement of a 2017 sanctions law for countries that purchase Russian-made weapon systems or parts.

"Some nations who now actively seek a security relationship with the United States still rely on Russia for spare parts and other material," Mattis wrote, citing India and Vietnam as examples.

Otherwise, the new NDAA carries a spate of Cold War-like policy measures likely to irritate Russia. They include:

— $6.3 billion for the European Deterrence Initiative, the largest U.S. infusion yet for this effort — started during the Obama administration — that's aimed at bolstering defenses in European nations near Russia.

— A requirement that Secretary Mattis send Congress by March 2019 a feasibility report on permanently stationing in Poland U.S. Army brigade combat teams that are currently cycling through nine-month rotations there. Russia maintains that the 1997 NATO-Russia Founding Act prohibits the establishment of permanent NATO bases in former Warsaw Pact nations, including Poland. NATO and the U.S. disagree, but have nonetheless held off establishing new bases in those countries during the 21 years since the act was signed.

— A directive that Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin brief Congress on all assets known to be held by Russian President Vladimir Putin, his "oligarch" associates and other high officials in Russia.

— A strengthening of a ban on funding anything that recognizes the sovereignty of Russia over Crimea.

— A labeling of Russia as a violator of the Chemical Weapons Convention, based on Russia's alleged role in chemical attacks in Syria and Kremlin-linked assassination attempts in the United Kingdom.

— A requirement for certification that Trump has imposed sanctions on Russia for violations of the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty, as he had been directed to do in the 2018 NDAA; the bill also calls for the administration to submit plans to Congress for additional sanctions. A House provision was dropped that had called for considering INF treaty obligations nonbinding if Russia is not in compliance with the treaty.

— A ban on extending the New START nuclear arms limitation treaty (which expires in Feb. 2021) unless Congress receives a report from the administration on Russia's new strategic weapons determining whether Russia is in compliance with the treaty.

— Authorizes $65 million "for developing and producing a low-yield warhead to be mounted on a submarine-launched ballistic missile," according to a summary of the bill. Proponents say this would deter Russia from using tactical, lower-yield weapons; opponents say such weapons increase the likelihood of nuclear war.

1 posted on 08/30/2018 9:45:47 AM PDT by CondoleezzaProtege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

Mattis is a bloody idiot.

China has been aggressive in the region and has to be checked and ISOLATED.

Russia has not done anything we wouldn’t have done in the same position, and less than what Reagan did within our sphere of influence.

We need to get out of NATO, form a Russian, central European, Asian alliance, and present a united front against islam - which is by far the major threat in the world today. We must stop supporting sunni. Russia must stop supporting shia.

“Terrorism” is not a threat. “Radical islam” is not a threat. Islam IS THE threat.


2 posted on 08/30/2018 10:19:10 AM PDT by TheTimeOfMan (A time for peace and a time for war)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheTimeOfMan
Mattis is a bloody idiot.

Are you questioning our President's judgment in appointing Secretary Mattis and adhering to his advice? His views are also echoed by our chief diplomat, Secretary Pompeo.

3 posted on 08/30/2018 12:17:35 PM PDT by CondoleezzaProtege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

Yes.

I have no doubt Mattis is a great field commander. As Sec Def his gross ignorance of real geopolitics is dangerous.


4 posted on 09/02/2018 7:57:08 PM PDT by TheTimeOfMan (A time for peace and a time for war)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson