No indication in the March 29 letter that Huber would make a public report.
Sessions said “upon conclusion of his review, will receive his recommendations”.
https://cdn.cnn.com/cnn/2018/images/03/29/ag.letter.re.ig.and.huber.reviews.pdf
I never said it would be a public report.
I said, he’s likely already reported his findings to Rosensessions, and it’s likely in writing, and Sessions needs to be hauled in front of Grassley and asked.
Surely you would support that, right?