Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TRUMP Goes on Offense: Calls on FISA Judge to Call in Comey, Rosenstein & Press Criminal Charges
The Gateway Pundit ^ | Aug 29-2018 | Jin Hoft

Posted on 09/02/2018 2:41:32 AM PDT by free_life

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-127 next last
To: free_life
...& if she finds there were crimes committed, and there were, there should be a criminal referral by her….”

IF the FISA judges weren't in on it too, the referrals would go to who? Who or what will make the charges? The DoJ?

Had Zer0 not purged the officer corps, military tribunals might have been the answer. IMO as things stand now, there is NO trustworthy federal law enforcement entity.

21 posted on 09/02/2018 4:34:01 AM PDT by Roccus (When you talk to a politician...ANY politician...always say, "Remember Ceausescu")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: free_life

Just arrest Obama, Jarrett, and Holder, and be done with it.

Lots of time is being wasted on minor characters.


22 posted on 09/02/2018 4:40:12 AM PDT by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flick Lives

Not merely courts as in finding guilt or innocence - courts regularly grantng the state permission to break every law in the book and the Constitution as they hunt for ‘crimes.’


23 posted on 09/02/2018 4:43:00 AM PDT by relictele
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“Be a shame if John Roberts had to retire and President Trump put Ted Cruz in that seat.”

When the secret recordings NSA did and Obama used for blackmail purposes come out.


24 posted on 09/02/2018 4:44:12 AM PDT by tired&retired (Blessings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

BAAAA-BOOMMMM!


25 posted on 09/02/2018 4:44:56 AM PDT by LiveFreeOrDie2001 ( Thank GOD Hillary didn't get elected!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: free_life

Someone is giving the President the wrong information. The Chief Justice isn’t in charge of the FISA court, he only appoints the judges. The FISA court only approves surveillance warrants, it does not issue arrest warrants or press criminal charges. Trump has a whole Justice Department that can do that for him.


26 posted on 09/02/2018 4:54:14 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: free_life

Wonder how much it costs to buy a FISA court judge these days.


27 posted on 09/02/2018 4:58:54 AM PDT by teletech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Be a shame if John Roberts had to retire and President Trump put Ted Cruz in that seat.

Cruz wants to be president, not Supreme Court justice.

28 posted on 09/02/2018 5:02:19 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg
Trump has a whole Justice Department that can do that for him

...unless the "Justice Department" decides it just doesn't want to.

Under normal circumstances and the rule of law, you would be correct. Unfortunately, today we are living under neither.

29 posted on 09/02/2018 5:03:53 AM PDT by Roccus (When you talk to a politician...ANY politician...always say, "Remember Ceausescu")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: free_life
Trump Train is leaving the station and look who's driving!!
30 posted on 09/02/2018 5:07:47 AM PDT by rodguy911 (Home of the free because of the brave! MAGA!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: free_life

...if she finds there were crimes committed, and there were, there should be a criminal referral by her...


This tweet is important. It’s the first time Trump has asserted that crimes have been committed.

Or has he done so previously? If so I don’t remember it.

I hope we are seeing the beginnings of the counter offensive here.


31 posted on 09/02/2018 5:20:10 AM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JudgemAll

“My take is that I would be ready to sacrifice Trump to Mueller...”

Nope. Mueller gets nothing...but a rope.


32 posted on 09/02/2018 5:25:34 AM PDT by bk1000 (I stand with Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Roccus
Under normal circumstances and the rule of law, you would be correct. Unfortunately, today we are living under neither.

That doesn't change the fact that the FISA court doesn't issue arrest warrants, interrogate suspects, or answer to the Chief Justice.

33 posted on 09/02/2018 5:26:57 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: free_life

FISA Courts need to be abolished entirely.

L


34 posted on 09/02/2018 5:28:15 AM PDT by Lurker (President Trump isn't our last chance. President Trump is THEIR last chance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #35 Removed by Moderator

To: free_life
The judge is just as corrupt as is Mueller and Weissmann. In fact, most federal judges - up to this point - are part of the swamp. Sidney Powell's book (Licensed to Lie) focuses on the 5th Circuit, but one can extrapolate that the problems abound in the other federal circuit courts, too.
36 posted on 09/02/2018 5:33:21 AM PDT by Montana_Sam (Truth lives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: free_life

DOJ and FBI lied to FISA Court regarding the information in their applications.

President Trump appropriately announces to the world that the FISA Court needs to prosecute the FBI and DOJ for perjury and obstruction of justice.

Great move by Trump to focus the issue on a fight between two corrupt organizations—the FBI/DOJ and the FISA Court.


37 posted on 09/02/2018 5:35:59 AM PDT by Presbyterian Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SaveFerris

“And this all would never have come to light had Hillary von Felonious Pantsuit gotten into the WH.”

That is how sure they were that they fixed this election. There is no way in hell they thoight he had even a small chance


38 posted on 09/02/2018 5:42:51 AM PDT by Phillyred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

Wasn’t talking about that.
Was talking about whether the DoJ would do its Constitutional duty.


39 posted on 09/02/2018 5:43:11 AM PDT by Roccus (When you talk to a politician...ANY politician...always say, "Remember Ceausescu")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
I'd Rather have a justice who doesn't ignore our Constitution for personal advancement.
40 posted on 09/02/2018 5:46:36 AM PDT by ASA Vet (Jus Soli + Jus sanguinis = NBC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-127 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson