The entire concept of a piece of rogue software sitting on HRCs server just “friendly forwarding” *all* her email activity to a foreign actor is 500 times the evidence collected so far against Trump. It’s galaxies beyond the worst possible thing Trump is alleged to have done.
The implications are so vast and overwhelming. You know, everything that has been said about Trump is an allegation >> implication. It’s left to the listener how much of traitor he supposedly was, how dirty his dealings supposed were, and on and on. The Clinton thing, it’s impossible NOT to imagine the worst possible implications. And the incompetents in the FBI/CIA were all so damn intimidated, nobody there had the cojones to bring up how egregious her permanent security breach was except in the most timid way, and those few who did generally paid with their jobs.
TOO DAMN BAD those whistleblowers couldn’t “leak” the info about the status of HRCs server. No assurance it would have been covered. But it might have been stopped.
“Compromised” ... “plausible deniability” : “po-ta-to ... po-tah-to”
Ex-President Bill Clinton (exploiting the presidency) panhandles for foundation donations from the Chinese.
Hillary as the US president is the carrot-on-the-stick to get money
Clinton told a Chinese audience that a female president would be good for the United States. Clinton was in China to meet with the country’s president and promote the "Clinton Foundation."
I want this all to be true, but why aren’t the various committees calling witnesses, and getting to the bottom of what the evidence proves? If this email-forwarding (I will not call it hacking, since it could well have been volitional) occurred years ago, the perpetrators know what they did. Where is the ICIG now? Put the records and evidence on the table.
question is how much did they pay the traitor to do it ?