Some also say BS to the NYT’s opinion piece. I don’t agree. The history of President Trump’s administration includes repeated reports of people using encryption and all to share and scheme, to resist from the inside. What I don’t understand is the in-your-face statement given to the NYT. The writer cannot be so clueless to think they won’t be discovered. What do they gain? And I mean seriously, the person will be forever marked like Monica Lewinsky. Even worse.
The NYT piece may be genuine. But the more reports of widespread “resistance” within the administration appear the more I’m inclined to believe they’re psych ops. They might be completely fabricated, or they might be real cases that are distorted or exaggerated. I’m rither case they’re designed to sow discord and undermine Trump.