Skip to comments.
Kavanaugh Will Kill the Constitution [Paul Krugman.......]
New York Times ^
| Paul Krugman
Posted on 09/06/2018 2:07:08 PM PDT by Sub-Driver
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-77 next last
To: Sub-Driver
K will kill the Constitution?
He just won every Democrat vote to confirm!
To: Behind the Blue Wall
Krugman, NYT, Nov. 9, 2016: We are very probably looking at a global recession, with no end in sight.Why is Krugman still employed? His track record is abysmal, and characterized by failure after failure.
How is the NYT still in business? I guess that they cater to those with Trump Derangement Syndrome, a shrinking group.
42
posted on
09/06/2018 2:58:50 PM PDT
by
olezip
To: alloysteel
An “anonymous inside source” said that his dog often craps in krugman’s shoes. Apparently, even his dog sees no value in this self-important loser.
43
posted on
09/06/2018 3:03:26 PM PDT
by
hal ogen
(First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
To: Sub-Driver
Hey Paul, remind us again your production on the stock market after Trump won...
Oh for reference it’s up 40% since the election.
44
posted on
09/06/2018 3:12:43 PM PDT
by
VRWCarea51
(The Original 1998 Version)
To: Popman
I see Krugman is still an idiot... Bump
45
posted on
09/06/2018 3:16:02 PM PDT
by
jpsb
To: Sub-Driver
Kavanaugh Will Kill the Constitution
False
The legitimacy of the Supreme Court is on the line.
False
You have to imagine Paul Krugman as a dying Lord Voldemort.
He sucks on unicorn blood under the moon to stay alive.
46
posted on
09/06/2018 3:28:50 PM PDT
by
Eddie01
To: Sub-Driver
There is a different version of the United States Constitution for Liberals? Who knew?
47
posted on
09/06/2018 3:30:27 PM PDT
by
Kickass Conservative
(THEY LIVE, and we're the only ones wearing the Sunglasses.)
To: knighthawk
The NYT is Paul Krugman’s horcrux.
Smash the NYT and you defeat Paul Krugman.
48
posted on
09/06/2018 3:31:42 PM PDT
by
Eddie01
To: olezip
Yes, Krugman should be forever discredited based on that one alone, much less the previous examples. The NYT is basically the house organ of the Democratic Party/Deep State.
To: Sub-Driver
There’s no drama in that headline.
50
posted on
09/06/2018 3:37:43 PM PDT
by
lurk
To: Sub-Driver
Krugman should read the constitution.
51
posted on
09/06/2018 3:49:17 PM PDT
by
Retvet
(Retvet)
To: Sub-Driver
“Once again we see a rushed, nakedly partisan process”
To quote your “princess” Krugman:
“we have to pass it to find out what is in it”.
Flippin’ HYPOCRITE!
52
posted on
09/06/2018 3:50:54 PM PDT
by
Roman_War_Criminal
(Like Enoch, Noah, & Lot, the True Church will soon be removed & then destruction comes forth.)
To: headless_thompson_gunner
He’s hardly an economist, more a Marxist than anything.
53
posted on
09/06/2018 3:52:50 PM PDT
by
Roman_War_Criminal
(Like Enoch, Noah, & Lot, the True Church will soon be removed & then destruction comes forth.)
To: Zionist Conspirator
BTW: You will notice that whenever liberals talk about "the Constitution" they mean the Bill of Rights
And they don't care about all ten of the Amendments. Gone is the First Amendment, Second and the Tenth, off the top of my head. I'm sure we Freepers can add to this "deplorable' list.
54
posted on
09/06/2018 4:00:23 PM PDT
by
RedMonqey
("Those who turn their arms in for plowshares will be doing the plowing for those who didn't.")
To: Sub-Driver
That kind of foreign rhetoric is expected from a New Yuk publication.
55
posted on
09/06/2018 4:07:30 PM PDT
by
familyop
("Welcome to Costco. I love you." - -Costco greeter in the movie, "Idiocracy")
To: Sub-Driver
The only subject Krugman knows less about than constitutional law is economics.
56
posted on
09/06/2018 4:08:09 PM PDT
by
chuckee
(extended beyond the time)
To: Sub-Driver
Losing the popular vote. Absolutely irrelevant.
Eked out a electoral vote win. Yeah if you think 304 to 227 is ekeing.
Aid from a hostile power. Well, if by that you mean they were able to deliver information about Hillary (all true, by the way),that the U.S. media refused to address, maybe so. No evidence that this happened though.
Krugman, reliably feckless as always.
57
posted on
09/06/2018 4:19:45 PM PDT
by
fhayek
To: Sub-Driver
Kavanaugh Will Kill the Constitution [Paul Krugman.......]...the way Krugman would have killed everyone's 401K's had they followed his advice when Trump was elected and Krugman announced people should sell investments because Trump was going to destroy the economy?.....
To: Sub-Driver
Krugman: How rushed & nakedly partisan was the passage of OBAMACARE?
Do you just have a short memory——OR do I & others have a LONG one???
To: fhayek
Eked out a electoral vote win. Yeah if you think 304 to 227 is ekeing. I had to laugh with derision when I read that part of Krugman's rant!
60
posted on
09/06/2018 4:42:43 PM PDT
by
Paul R.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-77 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson