Posted on 09/07/2018 9:46:07 AM PDT by rktman
They were expecting her to perform more like a white person.
The dims sorely miss Stuart Smiley . . . he was an attack dog.
Live by the sword, die by the sword.
Do you know that she is a famous actor in Japan?
Did I hit "Post" ? Oh lawdie.
“Do you know that she is a famous actor in Japan?”
You have her confused with Godzilla.
Who is transgender.
Hard to believe those rags are not praising her.
She and Booker are such slimes. I would not be surprised if they run as Pres/VP on a ticket.
“Kavanaugh seemed not to know what she was talking about..”
Neither does she.
“Live by the sword, die by the sword.”
In her case the pork sword.
If journalists have any ideology it is to be part of the “right” crowd, to be seen as sophisticates, in the know. The left has gone so risibly overboard that it’s becoming untenable in the face of the mocking to claim solidarity with the crazies.
Negro, Female and Non-Eubonic bonus points will still keep her at a passing grade.
She succeeded bigly at making a fool of herself.
You can add Cory Booker to that list. They all turned the hearings into a circus.
Kamala Harris is NOT a natural born citizen. Yet she is being pushed to run in 2020. She needs the legs cut out from under her before we have Obama Part 2 on our hands.
There are a plethora of ineligible individuals being floated as possible candidates in 2020. This has to be nipped in the bud by the Supreme Court.
Someone called him ‘Jazz-hands’. That’s going to stick.
To answer your question you only need to understand what the Dems expect out of a SC nominee - to be a radical activist judge. They can’t pass any of their crazy, anti-liberty, legislation with the Constitution as it stands today. They have only two options, get rid of it, or reinterpret it. They would fail at amending it.
So of course, their assumption is that the “other side” intends to do exactly the same (have an activist judge). The difference is that non-activist judges interpret the Constitution as it is written, which is just unacceptable to the left.
When they talk of “maintaining precedent” they’re talking about Roe vs. Wade. They’re hypocrites, if it’s about gun control rulings they’d want an activist judge to overturn it in a heartbeat. I find it disgusting when they claim that the nominee can’t be all of the things that they would want in a judge if the situation was reversed. They’re admitting what they would want, so it can’t be enabled on the other side.
RED WAVE could be rising in CA.
That is probably what is driving Xpresident Obama
to campaign for Democrats in California, a supposedly
blue bastion !
How are you doing lady?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.