Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senator Kamala Harris Not a Natural Born Citizen of USA to Constitutional Standards
Scribd ^ | 8/11/2018 | Charles F. Kerchner, Jr.

Posted on 09/08/2018 10:23:35 AM PDT by EagleUSA

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-157 next last
To: EagleUSA

this is an abject waste of time and, what is infinitely more valuable, energy. she’s almost certainly going to be the nominee, and every once of strength exerted on this “natural born citizen” red herring is wasted, and can NOT be brought to bear to oppose her on her extremist policy views.

but I am supremely confident there will be as many “natural born citizen” threads as for obama, and wasting just as must energy, if not more.

it’s truly unpardonable to be simply incapable of learning your lesson the first time.


61 posted on 09/08/2018 11:40:35 AM PDT by JohnBrowdie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Artemis Webb

Not a pointless windmill, why do you think she is so desperate to keep Kavanaugh off the courts

Some people seem to give up so quickly, not me!

Sic Semper Tyrranis!

Get in the game or get off the field


62 posted on 09/08/2018 11:46:44 AM PDT by 100American (Knowledge is knowing how, Wisdom is knowing when)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Brian Griffin

This is the British Nationality Act of 1730:

http://www.uniset.ca/naty/BNA1730.htm

‘WHEREAS by an Act of Parliament made in the seventh Year of the Reign of her late Majesty Queen Anne, intituled, An Act for naturalizing of foreign Protestants, it is, amongst other Things, enacted, That the Children of all natural-born Subjects, born out of the Ligeance of her said late Majesty, her Heirs and Successors, should be deemed, adjudged and taken to be natural-born Subjects of this Kingdom to all Intents, Constructions and Purposes whatsoever: And whereas in the tenth Year of her said late Majesty’s Reign another Act was made and passed to repeal the said Act (except what related to the Children of her Majesty’s natural-born Subjects, born out of her Majesty’s Allegiance:)”

“And whereas some Doubts have arisen upon the Construction of the said recited Clause in the said Act of the seventh Year of her late Majesty’s Reign:’ Now for the explaining the said recited Clause in the said Act, relating to Children of natural-born Subjects, and to prevent any Disputes touching the true Intent and Meaning thereof, May it please your most Excellent Majesty that it may be declared and enacted, and be it declared and enacted by the King’s most Excellent Majesty, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and the Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the Authority of the same, That all Children born out of the Ligeance of the Crown of England, or of Great Britain, or which shall hereafter be born out of such Ligeance, whose Fathers were or shall be natural-born Subjects of the Crown of England, or of Great Britain, at the Time of the Birth of such Children respectively, shall and may, by virtue of the said recited Clause in the said Act of the seventh Year of the Reign of her said late Majesty, and of this present Act, be adjudged and taken to be, and all such Children are hereby declared to be natural-born Subjects of the Crown of Great Britain, to all Intents, Constructions and Purposes whatsoever.”

I didn’t know of the partial repeals of the 1709 statute before.

Perhaps Obama wasn’t a “natural-born citizen” after all.


63 posted on 09/08/2018 11:47:44 AM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

Compared to Obama, this is a nothing Burger. He has never been naturalized and he was never a citizen. Until he got his ceremonial Senate passport.


64 posted on 09/08/2018 11:49:00 AM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

“thus inherited their respective birth nation’s citizenship when she was born, in addition to being a basic Citizen by being born in the USA to aliens legally domiciled here”

That is exactly right. Assuming both parents came here legally, which in the early ‘60s they probably did.

But she is not “natural born” as noted here.

And as for her upbringing in Canada, it’s clear she was saturated with anti-American hate by the school systems in that country where all Canadians view Americans with dripping, disdainful contempt.

Harris brings all of that. She’s an AINO: American In Name Only. Why she wants to live in our country, no one can tell.

But she has no business making laws for us.


65 posted on 09/08/2018 11:49:57 AM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Griffin

We are not British.


66 posted on 09/08/2018 11:51:17 AM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here of Citizen Parents__Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: JohnBrowdie

It is unpardonable to not learn your lesson from the Kenyanesian Usurpation.

Anyone born with multiple nationalities is not naturally an American.

The founders wanted someone who was solely and naturally an American.


67 posted on 09/08/2018 11:53:45 AM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here of Citizen Parents__Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

Time has come to vet Kamala.

She’s just another Democrat faker.


68 posted on 09/08/2018 12:08:58 PM PDT by ptsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

the major media will cover this up just like they covered up Obama (and a couple more) candidates’ ineligibility

its awful but our USA Constitution has been pretty much torn to pieces (including major portions of our Bill of Rights)


69 posted on 09/08/2018 12:12:54 PM PDT by faithhopecharity ("Politicians aren't born, they're excreted." -Marcus Tillius Cicero (3 BCE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Artemis Webb

Both parents are foreign born, and neither parent was a U.S. citizen at the time of her birth. You have to live in this country for 5 years before acquiring American citizenship (only 3 if you are married to an American citizen, which neither was). She’ll probably claim she is an anchor baby and a citizen by being born here. DO AWAY WITH ANCHOR BABY CITIZENSHIP!


70 posted on 09/08/2018 12:20:09 PM PDT by kiltie65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA
"Therefore every person born within the United States, its territories or districts, whether the parents are citizens or aliens, is a natural born citizen in the sense of the Constitution, and entitled to all the rights and privileges appertaining to that capacity." U.S. Attorney William Rawle, A View of the Constitution of the United States (1825).
71 posted on 09/08/2018 12:20:48 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

it’s just stupid to push an argument that already (and recently) failed miserably.

keep waving the “I know the founders’ intention” flag. you’ll be just as big a loser as the first time.

they’ll cover the idiocy as a sideshow, instead of helping us hammer her REAL weakness; her extremist agenda.


72 posted on 09/08/2018 12:23:17 PM PDT by JohnBrowdie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Brian Griffin

“So even if Obama was born in Kenya, he would be considered a “natural-born” citizen because his mom was”.

If that is true, then there would have been no need for Congress to grant Winston Churchill, Prime Minister of Great Britain, HONORARY US citizenship in 1963. His mother was an NBC, and he was born in GB.


73 posted on 09/08/2018 12:29:51 PM PDT by DMZFrank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Artemis Webb

It is only a dead letter if you give up on contesting it.


74 posted on 09/08/2018 12:31:22 PM PDT by nonsporting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Comment #75 Removed by Moderator

To: EagleUSA

That boat has sailed


76 posted on 09/08/2018 1:00:06 PM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #77 Removed by Moderator

To: DMZFrank
If that is true, then there would have been no need for Congress to grant Winston Churchill, Prime Minister of Great Britain, HONORARY US citizenship in 1963. His mother was an NBC, and he was born in GB.

When Churchill was born citizenship passed to children born overseas through the father. When Obama was born it was mother or father.

78 posted on 09/08/2018 1:13:46 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Artemis Webb

defining and enforcing the constitution is now pointless to that “conservative.” It iOS more important now than ever.


79 posted on 09/08/2018 1:16:14 PM PDT by morphing libertarian (Use Comey's Report; Indict Hillary now. --- Proud Smelly Walmart Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

This the women asking questions about a supreme court nominee but will not answer questions about her interest in being president


80 posted on 09/08/2018 1:17:41 PM PDT by morphing libertarian (Use Comey's Report; Indict Hillary now. --- Proud Smelly Walmart Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-157 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson