Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Klein: Evidence Mounting of Trump Tower Collusion… Against Don Jr.
Breitbart ^ | 2018-09-08 08:55 | Aaron Klein

Posted on 09/08/2018 11:42:09 AM PDT by McQ444

Multiple recent Breitbart News investigations into the infamous brief meeting at Trump Tower on June 9, 2016 between individuals tied to Russia, Donald Trump Jr. and other campaign officials point to the increasing likelihood of the confab being set up as a dirty trick against Donald Trump’s presidential campaign.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: clinton; spygate; trumpfamily; trumprussia; trumptowermeeting
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last
To: rbg81

Trump doesn’t have to fire them, but he sure as hell could push to defund them.


21 posted on 09/08/2018 12:54:51 PM PDT by ScottinVA (Liberals, piss off. That is all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal

Not how I took it.


22 posted on 09/08/2018 12:55:02 PM PDT by madison10 (Pray for President Trump and the midterm elections -88-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: McQ444

So maybe the next thing is to squeeze Don Jr. and pressure Lotus into resigning to save him from getting indicted.


23 posted on 09/08/2018 12:59:09 PM PDT by bigbob (Trust Sessions. Trust the Plan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: july4thfreedomfoundation

The meeting was decorded, no doubt. They wanted an offer to “look into the magnitsky act,” in return for promised dirt on Hillary.

Trump’s team would have been arrested, and his candidacy over.


24 posted on 09/08/2018 1:04:09 PM PDT by Basket_of_Deplorables (Sessions IS "The Insurance Policy.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cdcdawg
Collusion to do what, exactly?

Explain the goofy OMG! face on the goon-faced Halfrican when he met the impressive president-elect?
The dirt Hillary was supposed to sweep under the rug is now in the hands of the man the Halfrican tried to destroy.

"After all we did for her, that lousy Hillary lost. "How’m I gonna get out of the mess I’m in?"
"I know, we’ll invent Russian collusion.......lie like crazy.......setup Trump to take the blame.”

25 posted on 09/08/2018 1:13:30 PM PDT by Liz ( Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use. \)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: raiderboy

OMG!! Someone molested a statue? That’s not funny.


26 posted on 09/08/2018 1:15:33 PM PDT by mouske
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: All
Then-CIA Director, John Brennan, sucked up bigtime to get a job with Hillary;
he worked tidbits from the phony ‘Pee Dossier’ into Obama’s Daily Intel Briefing (PDB).
My takeaway is that Brennan and Hillary pegged Obama correctly......

<><> Obama was stupid enough to believe it......and,

<><> too stupid to understand he was reading falsified intel.

==================================

(HAT TIP PAS) We know this whole investigation was “By The Book”. Obama told them it had to be by the book.
Problem is the Halfrican told them after the fact (in January after they had been at it for a long while). /s

cont

27 posted on 09/08/2018 1:19:59 PM PDT by Liz ( Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use. \)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Nifster

cont

Obama’s NSA adviser Susan Rice wrote a CYA memo to herself and confessed to a series of crimes that added the time line and inferences about what the outgoing Obama administration illegally concealed from incoming President Trump and his aides.

(CYA memos are rarely a good idea. Most often, they reveal things the author never intended——ala Susan Rice’s now-infamous email to herself.)

powerlineblog.com

SUSAN RICE WRITES AN EMAIL TO HERSELF........the extraordinary email Obama’s National Security Advisor Susan Rice wrote to herself at 12:15 on January 20, 2017........within minutes of President Trump’s inauguration must have been her last act, more or less, before she vacated the White House. So obviously the email was important to her. But why would it be important to send an email to herself (the only person copied was one of her aides)?

If you read the email, along with Senator Grassley’s letter to Rice, it is obvious that it is a CYA memo. But the question is, whose A is being C’d?

Most attention, so far, has focused on the first two paragraphs of the email, which describe a meeting that occurred around two weeks earlier. The participants included
<><>Barack Obama, <><>Joe Biden, <><>James Comey, <><> Sally Yates–who turns up like a bad penny whenever skulduggery is afoot– <><>and Rice:

Rice made sure to underscore that Obama began the conversation by stressing his continued commitment to ensuring that every aspect of this issue is handled by the Intelligence and law enforcement communities “by the book”.

Rice writes Obama stressed that he is not asking about, initiating or instructing anything from a law enforcement perspective. He reiterated that our law enforcement team needs to proceed as it normally would by the book.

This is pure boilerplate. It represents, obviously, the company line. But Rice did not write her email to cover Barack Obama’s rear end. If she or anyone else had wanted to document the claim that Obama said to proceed “by the book,” the appropriate course would have been an official memo that copied others who were present and would have gone into the file. (My guess is that such a memo was written, but we haven’t seen it.)

The important part of the email is not the paragraph that purports to exonerate Obama, but the paragraphs that follow: “From a national security perspective, however, President Obama said he wants to be sure that, as we engage with the incoming team, we are mindful to ascertain if there is any reason that we cannot share information fully as it relates to Russia.”

The next paragraph of the email remains classified and has been redacted. The email concludes: The President asked Comey to inform him if anything changes in the next few weeks that should affect how we share classified information with the incoming team. Comey said he would.

CONCLUSION Why did Susan Rice send herself an email purporting to document this part of the meeting? Because she was C’ing her own A. Rice was nervous about the fact that, at the president’s direction, she had failed to “share information fully as it relates to Russia” with President

Trump’s incoming national security team. Her actions violated longstanding American tradition. Outgoing administrations have always cooperated in the transition to a new administration, whether of the same or the opposing party, especially on matters relating to national security.

Susan Rice is far from the brightest bulb on the tree, but she was well aware that by concealing facts ostensibly relating to national security from her counterpart in the new administration–General Michael Flynn–she was, at a minimum, violating longstanding civic norms.

If Rice actually lied to Flynn, she could have been accused of much worse. So Rice wanted to be able to retrieve her email, if she found herself in a sticky situation, and tell the world that she hid relevant facts about Russia from the new administration on Barack Obama’s orders.

What were the secrets that Obama wanted to keep from the new administration? We can easily surmise that the fact that the Steele memo was paid for by the Democratic Party; that the FBI had to some degree collaborated with Steele; that the Clinton campaign had fed some of the fake news in the dossier to Steele; and that Comey’s FBI had used Steele’s fabrications as the basis for FISA warrants to spy on the Trump campaign were among the facts that Obama and his minions didn’t want Michael Flynn and Donald Trump to know. Susan Rice, we can infer, was told to keep these secrets, and if anyone ever asked why she had failed to disclose them to Michael Flynn and others on Trump’s team, or even lied to those people, she would have the defense that President Obama ordered her to do it.

There may be more to it than this. The redacted paragraph likely contains more information about what it was that Rice wasn’t supposed to tell the Trump team. One of these days, we will learn what was blacked out.

The fact that Michael Flynn was Susan Rice’s counterpart in the incoming administration may also be significant. We know that the FBI agents who interviewed General Flynn–even Peter Strzok!–reported that they didn’t think he had lied about anything. And yet, Obama’s DOJ and Bob Mueller’s “investigation”–basically a continuation of Obama’s corrupt Department of Justice under another, less accountable name–persecuted Flynn to the point where he finally pled guilty to a single count of lying to the FBI in order, as he says, to end the madness and the financial drain.

Why were the Democrats so determined to discredit General Flynn? Perhaps because they wanted to pre-empt any outrage that may otherwise have followed on revelations that the Obama administration’s National Security Advisor hid important facts from her successor during the transition, and may have lied to him about those facts, in violation of all American tradition.


28 posted on 09/08/2018 1:21:13 PM PDT by Liz ( Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use. \)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal

I was not confused by the title. Read it again. The topic of the article is exactly what I thought it would be.


29 posted on 09/08/2018 1:56:31 PM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (Molon Labe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: cdcdawg

Collusion to do what, exactly?

Get dirt of the Hillabeast, but wait, there is nothing in federal criminal law that obtaining opp research is a crime. What to do, what to do?


30 posted on 09/08/2018 2:05:49 PM PDT by usurper ( version)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: McQ444
likelihood of the confab being set up as a dirty trick against Donald Trump’s presidential campaign.

Once the dookie hits the fan, I think this is how the Leftists and media (but I repeat myself) will try to spin it - that it was just political "dirty tricks" and not criminal/treasonous behavior.

31 posted on 09/08/2018 2:12:23 PM PDT by Major Matt Mason (The U.S. Senate - where American freedom dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pining_4_TX
"This is like a bad movie that is going to have a terrible ending."

Cheer up. This could all end up like a good movie with a good ending, just like The Godfather.

32 posted on 09/08/2018 2:42:24 PM PDT by Daaave ("He say you blade runner.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell

Mueller is covering his own ass with his investigation.”””

Mueller is building his own bank account by dragging everything on & on & on.....


33 posted on 09/08/2018 3:04:11 PM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: McQ444

I am so tired of this made up setup..
Mr President, release all of the documemts.


34 posted on 09/08/2018 3:25:09 PM PDT by frnewsjunkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McQ444

Hillary sold 20 percent of our uranium to the Russians while secretary of state in return they were paid huge amounts of money to their so called global initiative, this is all ok, bite me


35 posted on 09/08/2018 4:31:57 PM PDT by ronnie raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: piasa
From the article: One Russian participant in the Trump Tower presentation admits to personally knowing Hillary Clinton since the late 1990s and says he “knew” some of the people who worked on Clinton’s 2016 campaign. Another Russian attendee, a translator, testified that he was previously an interpreter for Hillary herself as well as for John Kerry and Barack Obama. Questions are also raised by a timeline showing numerous personal meetings between Fusion GPS co-founder Glenn Simpson and Trump Tower participants. A Clinton associate, Ed Lieberman, was listed as being present at one and possibly two of those meetings. Separately, Lieberman met with one Russian participant the same day of the Trump Tower meeting, according to separate testimony. In testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee, Robert Goldstone, the publicist, further said that he believes the meeting was a 'bait and switch' by a Russian lobbyist seeking a meeting on another matter by misleadingly claiming to be bringing the Trump campaign dirt on Clinton. . .Simpson and Fusion GPS were hired by BakerHostetler, which represented the Russian firm Prevezon, to do opposition work targeting British financier Bill Browder. It was Browder who did extensive investment work in Russia and who successfully lobbied Congress to pass the Magnitsky Act. . .Breitbart News first reported that attorney Edward Lieberman, whose late wife Evelyn served as Hillary Clinton’s chief of staff, exchanged numerous emails with Glenn Simpson of Fusion GPS and with the Russian participants in the infamous June 9, 2016, Trump Tower meeting, documentation provided to the Senate Judiciary Committee shows. . .Besides working for Hillary Clinton while she was First Lady, Lieberman’s late wife, Evelyn, also served as Bill Clinton’s deputy chief of staff, and famously transferred Monica Lewinsky out of the White House to the Defense Department. . .Lieberman’s alleged association with the Trump Tower fiasco was previously spotlighted in testimony by Akhmetshin, as first reported by Breitbart News. Akhmetshin describes meeting with Lieberman two times the same day as the Trump Tower meeting. . .Samochornov, the translator, also has links to Clinton. Samochornov testified that he was previously an interpreter for Clinton, John Kerry, and Barack Obama. . .
36 posted on 09/08/2018 6:22:14 PM PDT by Fedora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fedora
Goldstone testified that Veselnitskaya did not present herself as working for Russia during the meeting.
37 posted on 09/08/2018 6:32:32 PM PDT by Fedora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Fedora
In his testimony, Goldstone further attempted to explain his unusual phraseology in the email to Trump Jr. . . .I received — I received the call from Emin that morning, and he asked me if I could contact the Trumps with something interesting and said that a well-connected Russian attorney had met with his father that morning in his father’s office and had told him that they had some interesting information that could potentially be damaging regarding funding by Russians to the Democrats and to its candidate, Hillary Clinton.

So was this Hillary's attempt to pre-empt Trump bringing up the Uranium One scandal during the campaign?

38 posted on 09/08/2018 6:36:13 PM PDT by Fedora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Fedora
Goldstone’s testimony comes as Irakly “Ike” Kaveladze, senior vice president at Crocus Group, the real estate development firm run by Russian oligarch Aras Agalarov, gave similar descriptions of what happened inside the Trump Tower meeting. In his own testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee that was recently made public and was reviewed by this reporter, Kaveladze related that no one at the meeting presented themselves there as representing the Russian government, no one discussed hacked emails and no conversation took place that could possibly be characterized as “collusion” between Russia and the Trump campaign. Goldstone made similar remarks.
39 posted on 09/08/2018 6:39:44 PM PDT by Fedora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Fedora
Speaking in his Senate testimony, Kaveladze said that he didn’t see Goldstone’s email claiming incriminating information on Clinton before the meeting. He says that Aras Agalarov contacted him on June 6, 2016 to tell him about it. He said Agalarov “asked me if I knew anything about (the) Magnitsky Act, and I said I did, and so he said the meeting is going to be about Magnitsky Act.”
40 posted on 09/08/2018 6:41:59 PM PDT by Fedora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson