Replies

Oh, no. Not this again. Yawn. Wasn’t it done to death, and proven untrue, January 2017?

Trump supporters will stand for hours in below-freezing temperatures, and over-100-degree temperatures, just to get in to a rally. But nobody will show up for the inauguration on a beautiful day? Riiight.

Notwithstanding different timing of photos to give impression of sparse attendance, I'm willing to concede that Obama probably had more attendees - the "historic" element to his election would further draw minions to the inauguration, and (as someone else said) it's a subway ride for many of them.

Personally, the issue of attendance at the inauguration is like going to Time Square on New Year's Eve...who'd want to stand for 12 hours without a bathroom in the cold for a brief moment of celebration? The ones who go are hard core and most normal people watch on TV.

This ginned-up attendance "controversy" was but the first of the statist attempts to discredit MAGA. My view is: who cares, outside of the DC hospitality industry? Deplorables know the attendance that matters was on Election Day especially in the polling booths in MI, WI, FL, and PA. They can't hide the fact that Freedom won, and statism lost when and where attendance mattered, because their candidate didn't (or couldn't) campaign. Even the Young Turks Election night meltdown acknowledged as much.