The link has lots of hot links to articles and Judicial Watch files.
To: yesthatjallen
Wait!!!
Weiner got Strzok ‘d?
2 posted on
09/10/2018 12:17:10 PM PDT by
Vendome
(I've Gotta Be Me https://youtu.be/wH-pk2vZGw2M)
To: yesthatjallen
Just remember the rules. It’s only a conspiracy if Republicans do it.
3 posted on
09/10/2018 12:23:17 PM PDT by
Bullish
(My tagline is here. you just can't see it.)
To: yesthatjallen
So Strzok, Comey and Weiner finally come together in the same sentence.
6 posted on
09/10/2018 12:36:47 PM PDT by
ImJustAnotherOkie
(All I know is what I read in the papers.)
To: yesthatjallen
Comey = obstruction of justice...haul him in.
7 posted on
09/10/2018 12:39:31 PM PDT by
1Old Pro
To: yesthatjallen
I believe that the title is BS. Along with a similar title like this from the other day. The titles suggest that physical finger prints were found on documents and yet the stories do not support that conclusion. I believe they are using “finger prints” as a figure of speech, but they do not make that clear either. I hate BS misleading titles like this. SHAME on the author.
16 posted on
09/10/2018 2:12:59 PM PDT by
Revel
To: yesthatjallen
Time to send Tom Fitton and Judicial Watch my “Affirmation of Public Support,” and a check, to show my appreciation of his and JW’s campaign to stop my state from becoming another “sanctuary” for all whom we don't need here in Florida.
17 posted on
09/10/2018 2:16:49 PM PDT by
BatGuano
(You don't think I'd go into combat with loose change in my pocket do ya?)
To: yesthatjallen
Strzok and the weiner. They could have really come up with a better title.
20 posted on
09/10/2018 4:02:00 PM PDT by
pas
To: yesthatjallen
Despite Rybickis email suggesting late on November 5 that the review of the new emails had not been completed, Comeys November 6 letter to Congress stated, [W]e reviewed all of the communications that were to or from Hillary Clinton while she was Secretary of State. Based on our review, we have not changed our conclusions that we expressed in July with respect to Secretary Clinton. Is lying in a letter to Congress considered perjury?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson