Posted on 09/11/2018 2:15:19 PM PDT by yesthatjallen
The Hill actually wrote an article about an author quoting an anonymous source to confirm that his book based on anonymous sources is accurate.
who claimed trump was biased against mexicans?
“...but later publicly defamed him.”
Woodward thinks he is awfully cunning. Now, anyone who denies anything is automatically considered a colluding witness who is trying to protect himself.
So presently everyone is damned if they do and damned if they don’t.
I cannot imagine why anyone would let that snake within a thousand feet of the White House.
Trump can start to clean house by getting rid of anyone placed in position by McMasters and any hold-over from the Obama administration.
I personally could spend a few days walking through the White House and spot the traitors. It is not really hard.
lol
Woodward’s ‘key’ person’s existance is as phony as his book.
Maybe ‘low information voters’ can be swayed by this garbage, but the problem with ‘low information voters’ is that they do not read anything.
I know the guy who keeps the rest room key and it was NOT him!
Woodward gains financially with these lies. Like the Steele Dossier, unverified and salacious. See a pattern here?
***Hey, that’s 10 times better than being 100% correct.***
Otherwise, incorrect.
As there is no such thing as 1000% correct.
Is he 1000% insured against a libel suit?
Was it the guy with the discredited book?
Logic would say that if you are a “high government official,” interviewed by a well-known journalist, and have a negative view of the President, confiding in that journalist those views makes absolutely no sense. There is no reason to employ the media as recourse, rather introspection, privacy and resignation would be the obvious path. Do you really think these people hold their positions as a matter of opposition politics and naivety?
His book will be in the discount bin, along side Omarosa, in no time.
Unfortunately that will not be the case. It will be discussed and praised. A lot of people will read it and never consider the fallacy of “anonymity”. That is the nation we live in.
(To the tune of "Barbara Ann")
"Bob-Bob-Bob Bob-Bob is lying
Bob-Bob-Bob Bob-Bob is lying..."
You can’t assume anything this clown and the media tells you in correct. They have become that bad.
New anonymous sources verify the previous anonymous sources, who agree with the anonymous editorial.
It’s anonymous turtles all the way down.
What’s the frequency!!!
1000% true?
And he believes it?
What a moron.
Sorry, Bob, upping 100 to 1000 doesn’t make it more believable. It just shows that you are willing to embellish, maybe even fabricate, to make a point.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.