Posted on 09/12/2018 8:59:57 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
Those who speak of “climate change” carbon etc. know nothing about how weather works. It’s pretty easy to debunk them with the facts of how weather forms and how the entire planet has a specific rythum that operates very well without man made scams.
Lets see...the earliest snow on record in Europe this year, snow in Africa, cold temps in the UK, very early snow in Montana and WY this year-all these in the third or forth week of AUGUST!
Ya, I guess the climate does change.
Here is a prediction for the freaks. The lowest solar activity, nearly, since it has been recorded. The northwest and AK will see dry and above temps. Greenland will become green again and will be able to raise crops there and pasture cattle. The rest of the northern hemisphere? We are screwed.
Joe Bastardi and a certain former Professor from Ore State (cant think of his name off hand)have followed the historical climatic changes and have proof of what we are going into.
A solar minimum.
Oh that professor from Oregon State? The gov forced him out of there because he wouldnt fall for the GOREbull warming shit.
I got a book called the Plantagenet chronicles-its about the reign of some of the Normans in England after William the conquerers invasion and taking the crown in England. They chronicled the weather in that book and it was wild swings in weather. Enjoy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jXlXjvaKo1w
But human activity has nothing to do with the solar minimum, correct? That is the proof I am interested in - human activity causing global warming or climate change or whatever they are calling weather events or trends now.
Very, very little if any at all.
The scam artists had to change from Global Warming to Climate change because they knew dam well there aint any such thing as global warming.
But, the climate changes every second of every minute of every hour of every day.
The real climate investigators have determined that the earth goes through extreme wild swings from extreme cold to extreme warm. We have been in a mild period in climate terms the last 3 to 5 thousand years. About 10,000 BC, or so, there were no Great Lakes. The Sahara desert was green. Etc.
In the late 1800s, in the southwest, people actually froze to death and there were violent blizard’s. There actually were glaciers on the mountains in the southwest, although small, still they were glaciers.
Greenland was called Greenland for a reason. Then, it got cold and the vikings had to get to hell out of there.
All this goes in cycle with the solar cycles, volcanic activity, etc. Humans have a very, very small part or none at all, in that cycle.
If we did, we would have had a huge impact during the industrial revolution when they used coal to fire every dam thing without ANY pollution equipment on the smoke stacks. Instead, it was historically COLD during that period-late 1700s to late 1800s.
Nonsense.
All of which proves that if you live long enough, the Earth will provide you with all the DIVERSITY one can tolerate.
The article is just an excuse to reinforce this lie to a dumber than sheep general population who will accept it at face value as being “science”.
“”We have global warming, and so this actually makes these storms bigger and more intense,” he explains. Humans burn fossil fuels in our cars, our power plants and our airplanes, all of which release greenhouse gases that trap heat. Warmer oceans, especially, provide fuel for hurricanes in the form of evaporating moisture.”
This Man Made Climate Change religion has descended into one colossal wet dream. I knew those enviroweenies were just a cult of sexually repressed dorks.
Bingo!!! A man who understands statistics! And I would point out that the statistical samples are biased and manipulated by the very people gathering and analyzing them. In the future, if liberals get their way, posts like yours will be considered sedition, punishable by death.
Wasn’t it just last year the people in the southeast were whining and crying about a drought, partially because they hadn’t had a big storm in a while. Now, big storm and they’re whining and crying about too much rain.
A big percentage of their annual average precipitation comes historically from storms like this.
IF the data being used is accurate-and IF the data being used by all ‘researchers’ is the same I’d like to know HOW ten different computer models give ten different results. It’s like everyone has a Magic 8 ball and no answer is the same. Shouldn’t all scientifically accurate data add up the same?Somebody ‘splain it to me.
“The big problem we have with hurricanes is that tens of millions of people have moved to the southeast coast over the past three decades.”
Yes and as always, at least in my opinion, when people rush to a popular area they ruin the things that attracted them in the first place.
Second place, 1969 Camille.
On the face of it, (cough, cough) "climate change" is reversing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.