Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EagleUSA

With any luck Trump will get enough SCOTUS picks and they’’ go back and revisit that absurd Roberts opinion.


47 posted on 09/14/2018 8:26:10 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Buckeye McFrog
The Roberts opinion was fine -- and right now it is (temporarily at least) irrelevant.

I want to see other Supreme Court challenges that have nothing to do with the individual mandate (the subject of the Roberts decision) but address the broader issue of whether Congress can ever force insurance companies to include specific provisions in their medical insurance plans.

There's absolutely no reason why an insurance company should be prohibited from selling a plan that does not cover pre-existing conditions, or has a lifetime cap of, say, $10 million on its benefits. Create a plan that includes these two things, and you'd be shocked at how much less it would cost than one that meets the ridiculous ObamaCare requirements.

54 posted on 09/14/2018 8:31:46 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("The Russians escaped while we weren't watching them ... like Russians will.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson