35 openly public people vs one anonymous claimant.
Well, that settles it! He’s a WOMANIZER! ==> /s
looks like anonymous isn’t going to cut it anymore. Feinstein should be challenged to get the woman to reveal herself, and Feinstein herself advocating no anonymous tips will be used by the committee unless reviewed by the gang of 8.
(Geez, I've been in the Bay Area too long. I'm starting to think like the loony leftists out here!)
Democrats love their “invisible friends.” Gephardt had his pro-tax billionaire; Reid had his anonymous little boyfriend in Lighthouse; Feinstein now has her invisible informant; and on and on.
If you line up feinstein’s character alongside Kavanaugh’s, she loses every time. For starters, Kavanaugh never (most likely knowingly) hired a spy from a foreign country inimical to the US interests in exchange for lots of money. Then take it from there.
Why do you hate women?
/s
Many years ago, Senator Joe McCarthy caught flak for claiming he had in his hand a list of more than 200 Federal employees whom he could ruin through exposure. Today, feinstein does essentially the same thing; let’s hope her fate is the same.
At least, Sen. McCarthy’s claims were ultimately proven true.
And apparently her only complaint was Kavanaugh and a buddy locked her in a room during a party and while she felt uncomfortable was able to escape her confinement. How frigging dreadful.
Is this an example of when they go low we go high? I mean, WTH, how LOW can they go! These people are truly mentally ill. Sick to death of this.
They are trying the Anita Hill offense.
Hill said in later years that she wanted Thomas off of the court because of abortion.
That is the main issue here.
Bet you a cold beer that Ms. Anonymous Accuser is also an abortion advocate and defender.
Yes, but that one anonymous claimant has the SJW sacred cow of: “Listen and Believe!!!” on her side.