Totally disagree. Tucker accomplished exactly what he posited: that Creepy Lawyer had exploited his client.
Avenatti lost his cool, and claimed that Trump ‘had unprotected sex without a condom’ with a ‘porn star’ ‘who had a 4mo baby at home’.
Never mind that she didn’t have a 4mo at the time, what could be more degrading to the woman, than describing her on national tv as a ‘porn’ worker ‘with a 4mo at home’ would go to the hotel room of a stranger for unprotected sex? That’s all her behavior not his. But Avenatti was willing to degrade, exploit, his client to gain points for himself in a one-upmanship with Tucker. (and that is why he is, indeed, a ‘creepy porn lawyer’)
‘who had a 4mo baby at home’.
**************************************
That term was referring to Trump, not the porn participant.