The linked article pretty much says the exact same thing - and lays it out as intentional - not sure why that’s being questioned.
As for the semantics of “alleged” - what would you prefer?
They haven’t been to trail yet. When they are convicted - the media will refer to them as “convicted killers.” until then, “alleged killers.”
It’s not like the word “alleged” carries some notion of doubt. Its pre-proof for sure - but doesn’t imply that proof doesn’t existed.
What title do I prefer???
The one like the link I posted.....
Police: Mother of MS-13 victim fatally struck by driver at vigil
I also appreciate how the article (that I linked to) starts out....
The mother of a Brentwood teenager who was brutally murdered by MS-13 was killed Friday after she was run over by a driver during a confrontation just before a candlelight vigil honoring her daughter’s memory.
~~~
Pulls no punches.
Why dance around by using the word ‘allegedly’ killed by MS13? That’s exactly who killed her daughter.