Posted on 09/16/2018 12:06:55 PM PDT by Lazamataz
The woman accusing Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault came forward with her explosive allegations on Sunday, saying the supposed attack "derailed me substantially for four or five years" and claiming that the episode rendered her "unable to have healthy relationships with men."
The woman, Christine Ford, is a professor at Palo Alto University, according to The Washington Post, which published her account on Sunday. Her decision to go public caps a whirlwhind week that began when Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., sent shockwaves through Washington by releasing a statement saying she turned over information about Kavanaugh from an anonymous accuser to the FBI.
Ford, a 51-year-old registered Democrat who has published in academic journals and trains students in clinical psychology, described the alleged incident on Sunday, saying it occurred at a Maryland house gathering. Ford claimed she headed upstairs to a bathroom when she was suddenly pushed onto a bed, as rock-and-roll music blared.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
This has nothing to do with Trump being "alone." Kavanaugh has been an establishment GOP tool for years.
Any one of us can make up a lie.
Interesting point: In the cults (my opinion) around various gurus they always have one or more women to attack them legally. An article “I’m In Love With My Guru” in a magazine detailed several of them.
Similar to Play Misty For Me (Clint Eastwood film about an obsessed female fan of a disc jockey who tried to murder him and his girlfriend).
In the Life of Yogananda by Philip Goldberg which I read recently, they said two independently done DNA tests years later to show the guru was innocent of paternity. He died in 1954 but scandal was still purported in a case later.
In the 1920s-1940s women swooned over various swamis and their husbands were enraged and asked police to arrest the swamis out of jealousy.
The Woodstock benediction guru Swami Satchindanda was accused of asking for sex, which as a celibate he strongly denied. Several other gurus had women who said they loved them and the swamis had sex with them. Denied and fought in court battles. Latest ones had DNA to save them from paternity cases. Some women see them and delude themselves that the guru is talking only to them and loves them.
I think Kavanaugh is now a rock star judge and so is attracting liars and book deal and book tour Omarosa types.
When young do we think women said to him at a party “Associate Appellate District Judge Intern? Step into my bedroom , dream guy?” More like, “That’s interesting. Sorry but I want to see if the green jello is being set up. See you sometime later.”
She was so drunk that night that all of her memories are highly suspect.
Prove me wrong.
It’s relevant to liberal senators like Murkowski who now have cover if they vote against Him
Go easy on that. I might have a Senate nomination hearing someday. I'll be shitcanned if you claim I saw your left breast.
I work with therapists and am married to an MD psychiatrist. I’ve studied memory plasticity and false recovered memories for years and have worked with patients who came to me after a therapist recovered a fabricated memory and destroyed the family.
Enough. Enough of this agitprop.
This is totally fabricated she-said-he-said, mud slinging just to sling mud, unsubstantiated BS. IF there ever was an issue, the time to deal with it has expired.
As a woman, I can tell when someone is lying and the bitch is lying!! What gives it away? all her social media posts have been scrubbed..why? If her accusation was the truth there would be no need to delete any of the posts from Facebook , Twitter and who knows what else!
You can't judge a book by its cover.
Not many women looked twice at me. But, when the right one did and discovered what I was packing, she was glad the others didn't look twice.
She cannot even name a DATE. Says it MIGHT be in the summer of 1982.
SHEESH
Aaaaaaarghhhh. Ugly.
Mine too. I hate these liberal pukes.
“However, reflexively calling her a liar is just more fodder for the Dems to paint republicans as anti-woman”
The are nor “reflexively” calling her a liar-——they are calling her a liar.
,
It “hurts” if you let it. History is littered with the bogus stories of partisan hacks and those with an agenda. Brawley, Duke, the nutter who dragged a mattress across campus, etc. Pointing out the vagueness of the concocted story and her Leftist beliefs isn’t attacking. It’s presenting facts to counter a fairy tale.
I am sick and tired of “conservatives” being fearful little wimps, worrying about what others will think of them for standing up to clear agitprop and transparent liars. This is just another example of a shameless Liberal doing whatever is necessary to smear a political opponent.
The woman is a lying sack of horse manure and if the screeching hounds of women’s lib find it sexist, they can shove it up their tailpipes.
/
/
Exactly.
It’s always the same handful on FR willing to give the left the benefit of the doubt or who are always with their concerns.
That’s ok. It wasn’t the left one. So I wouldn’t actually be lying to Congress.
I thought she wanted to remain anonymous! How do you like that - the story is out of the news for one day and bang! she’s given up her anonymity and is mouthing off to the press.
Color me shocked.
“It derailed me”
...that’s not how she got the knick name “train”
She scrubs her social media because people like you are personally attacking her. If you had an ounce of political savvy, you’d understand you are doing exactly what the Democrats want, make Republicans look like dumb, anti-woman, neanderthals.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.