Posted on 09/16/2018 4:49:34 PM PDT by Magnatron
Senator Dianne Feinstein
Dear Senator Feinstein;
I am writing with information relevant in evaluating the current nominee to the Supreme Court.
As a constituent, I expect that you will maintain this as confidential until we have further opportunity to speak.
Brett Kavanaugh physically and sexually assaulted me during high school in the early 1980's. He conducted these acts with the assistance of REDACTED.
Both were one to two years older than me and students at a local private school.
The assault occurred in a suburban Maryland area home at a gathering that included me and four others.
Kavanaugh physically pushed me into a bedroom as I was headed for a bathroom up a short stair well from the living room. They locked the door and played loud music precluding any successful attempt to yell for help.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
I’ll bet DiFi didn’t break this news she’s been sitting in since July until she knew that Ford’s social media posts were long deleted.
The other guy isn't about to become a Supreme Court Justice.
Just ignore it. Their credibility decreases with every unsubstantiated allegation. Their cries of “wolf” are taking a toll on them.
We don’t need to do anything. That is what Trump is teaching us - we will not only survive these attacks, but we will even come out stronger as a result of their failures.
Heh heh heh.
He said, "poke holes."
Heh heh heh.
/Beavis and Butthead>
You know, until that post, I always thought you *were* female.
Huh.
Didn't have to. I can type blind. I accepted your explanation.
Surprise. This woman lives in the San Francisco Bay Area, has donated to Democrats, and works as a professor at Stanford. She’s not fooling anybody...well, she might fool some RINOs like Jeff Flake, but hopefully the rest of the Republicans will swat this aside without much effort.
MOST BEDROOMS DO NOT HAVE DOOR LOCKS
—
Every house I’ve lived in has. The one I grew up in, our first and subsequent homes, have too.
A childhood friend’s dad removed her bedroom door, because she would always lock it, against house rules. I thought that was hilarious. Didn’t remove the lock....but, the entire door.
Now...what IS unusual, is having a bedroom that had a bathroom....unless it was a Master bedroom.
>>Moore tried to be polite to Hannity, and he didn’t deserve it. Hannity was doing all he could to destroy Moore.<<
I too watched the interview. Hannity seemed to go out of his way to undermine Moore’s credibility, and Moore vacillated in his responses instead of adamantly denying the accusations. I found both of them to be disgustingly STUPID.
Sounds like she was a little ‘ho...anybody’s. Would like to hear about her reputation among her peers.
>>You didn’t see it. Moore was a guest on Hannity’s radio show, NOT his TV show.<<
Moore may have been on Hannity’s radio show, but he was definitely interviewed by Hannity on TV because I watched it and was disgusted by the manner in which Hannity seemed to be intentionally trying to undermine and discredit the judge by his line of questioning.
I would say it is pretty much standard practice for them as it is.
Just checking to see if you were a hunt and peck typer or if you positioned your fingers on the home row.
>>I wonder if she would have come forward about this if the candidate was a Democrat???<<
LMAO! That’s the funniest thing posted on FR in quite awhile.
>> it sounds like a retard wrote that, not a psychologist and college professor.<<
Speaking from experience I can assure you that “retard”, “Psychologist”, and “college professor” are NOT mutually exclusive designations.
If the writer of that letter has a PhD degree, I would not trust the school that awarded it to her. It is a simple minded account by a simple person. I don’t believe this accusation is truthful and it should be disregarded and then discarded.
;)!
I never studied typing, and have never used a typing program. I learned to blind type out of sheer repetition, and a decision to just quit 'hunting'.
I just disciplined myself to keep my eyes off the keyboard, use all ten fingers, and correct as necessary until I got fast at it. Eventually it got to where I'd make more mistakes if I looked at the keyboard.
Your reply is interesting - and very common.
So do a thought experiment with me. Suppose every word is true. What do we have?
A 17 year old boy tries to get a girl's top off in a socially ambiguous situation.
It's now 38 years later. The accusation is proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
What does it mean to you about the man the boy has become?
Her “language” is TOO PROPER (”opportune”. “precluding”, etc). Sounds more like she is auditioning for a play or English class.
Also how she handled this “affair” is not quite believable.
Now we need to know if she was drunk at this “party”. Did anything even happen. Any witnesses to her condition, their conditions, etc? Were alcoholic drinks available to all? How about drugs?
Has she had mental problems over the years?
Why did she wait so long, as well as Feinstein, to make this public esp. when there have been many days of hearings/testimonies?
Is anyone paying her, for expenses, her story, etc?
Has she made similar accusations against anyone else over the years?
Is she married (haven’t read anything about her background, yet)?
Do I believe her - NO. Could it have happened - possibly. Could she have made it up like the false accusations against the Duke students - possibly. Could she be a pathological liar - possibly.
Has the statute of limitations “run” on simple assault/battery - yes.
Is she the newest ANITA HILL? Sounds like it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.