Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sitetest
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3688099/posts?page=68#68

Maryland Judiciary Case Search shows the case. On 08/08/96 UMLIC-EIGHT CORP, the lender, filed a request for foreclosure of the Blaseys' property at 17 Masters Court, Potomac.

On 08/13/96 Judge Michael D. Mason granted that request. According to the Montgomery County Land Records, on December 17, 1996, the Blaseys refinanced the property with Chevy Chase Bank. On 01/27/97 Judge Martha Kavanaugh signed UMLIC's motion to dismiss the foreclosure.

So the Blaseys refinanced the property, paid the foreclosing lender, and a foreclosure never occurred. Judge Kavanaugh's only involvement was to sign the dismissal of the foreclosure action, which would hardly create any animosity towards her or Brett by the Blaseys. It is also important to understand that foreclosures in Maryland are largely administrative. They are not adversarial proceedings in which a judge ultimately picks a side.

I am not trying to defend this c**t, but people are approaching the connection in the foreclosure case as if it's some important find. It is not. It means nothing. There are many far better ways to attack her than this.

68 posted on ‎9‎/‎17‎/‎2018‎ ‎6‎:‎35‎:‎26‎ ‎AM by KevinB

41 posted on 09/17/2018 6:06:48 AM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: Anti-Bubba182

Disagree completely. There is more to this than their is to the accusation of sexual assault. Period.

Why, after all this time? This is why. Case closed. Take the vote.


44 posted on 09/17/2018 6:11:01 AM PDT by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson