Posted on 09/20/2018 6:59:51 AM PDT by SJackson
Jimmy Carter must be pleased. He got to surrender his worst postwar president crown to Barack Obama, and now with Obamas recent return to public appearances, Jimmy is hopeful that his award for worst postwar ex-president will soon be gone as well. The real question for the rest of us is whether Obama will help or hurt the Dems in November.
Carter and Obama are competing in the same category: reactive presidents. In 1976 Carter seemed the antidote to the scandal-plagued Nixon years. The church-going peanut farmer from Georgia appeared to be the principled outsider who could cleanse the stains of Vietnam and Watergate. No matter that Vietnams escalation had been a Democrat show, or that Nixon had drawn down U.S. troops in Vietnam from nearly half a million in 1969 to 27,000 in 1972. Or that Watergate, as Conrad Black described the Europeans bemused reaction, was a pious exercise in Anglo-Saxon hypocrisy covering the crucifixion of a capable and successful president, one confected and peddled by the Nixon-hating media. As democracies are wont to do, the electorate swung from a good president perceived to be bad, to a bad president perceived (at first) to be good.
Carter didnt take long to show Americans that their reactive votes were a mistake. Carter was a knee-jerk moralizing internationalist who accepted the lie that Americas recent mistakes, as he said in his inaugural address, were the font of all the global disorder. Hence principled behavior by mere force of example would defuse conflicts and end human rights abuses. Disarmament, arms control agreements, the disintegration of the CIA, as Henry Kissinger put it, and the promotion of human rights would convert our inveterate rivals and enemies into friends and liberal democrats. As Carter said in his memoirs, Demonstrations of American idealism and moral principles should be the foundations of American power.
The consequences, of course, was the amoral Soviet Unions global rampage, and Carters befuddled and timid response to the Iranian hostage crisis, which jump-started todays neo-jihadist terrorism. His arrogant, misplaced piety, and his sermons about a crisis of confidence and an inordinate fear of communism disgusted many Americans. They knew that American confidence depended on vigorous action and patriotic pride, not homilies about our sins. Ronald Reagan was their answer, and a revived economy and a dismantled Soviet Union was the result.
Obama similarly was the response to George W. Bushs compassionate conservatism and wars mismanaged by naïve democracy promotion. Obamas failures are still fresh in our memory: more debt, more tax-and-spend domestic policy, a historically sluggish recovery, an unleashing of federal agencies against political enemies, a subordination of American sovereignty to the globalist technocratic cartel, a worsening of racial divisiveness, and a Carter-like foreign policy idealism of engagement, leading from behind, and strategic patience that culminated in the appeasement and bribery of Iran, and the furthering of the mullahs nuclear ambitions and genocidal anti-Semitism. Obamas lectures about Americas mistakes and dismissal of its exceptionalism disgusted voters. They knew that weakness invited aggression, and strength deterred it. Donald Trump was their answer, and a revived economy and greater respectwhich is not a synonym for affection abroad, was the result.
In the worst president bout, Obama takes the gold because Jimmy Carter at least recognized his mistakes with Iran and at the end of his term increased defense spending, and showed some muscle with the Carter Doctrine, which put the world on alert that the U.S. would use military force to defend its interests in the Persian Gulf. Obama, without the nuclear-armed Soviet Union still fighting the Cold War, ended his second term with the disastrous Iran nuke agreement, and with Russia and Iran rampaging through Syria in support of a psychopathic autocrat.
As an ex-president, Carter had scant respect for that alleged tradition of ex-presidents keeping quiet about their successors. (A tradition, by the way, that George W. Bush should have considered more honored in the breach than in the observance during Obamas eight years of transforming the U.S. from a constitutional Republic to a progressive technocratic oligarchy. Worse yet, when Bush did speak out, it was to trash Donald Trump not based on actions but on rhetoric and decorum and bad manners.)
Carter had no compunctions about staying in the public eye. His 1994 freelance diplomacy with North Korea miffed the Clinton administration. Carter negotiated a parchment barrier, one as thin as Hitlers Munich agreement, for stopping the Kim clans development of nuclear weapons. Years later, in the run-up to the second Gulf war, his outspoken and politically opportunistic public attacks on what the Dems called Bushs unilateralism and failed diplomacy in seeking authorization for a war against Saddam Hussein, won him a Nobel Peace Prize and publicly expressed gratitude from the Nobel Committee for opposing a war the Europeans opposed. So much for foreign policy debates stopping at the oceans edge. His later noisy participation in the dishonest and politically opportunistic antiwar movement culminated in his sitting next to Michael Moore, creator of the fictive anti-American documentary Fahrenheit 9-11, at the 2004 Democratic National Convention. These are just the highlights of Carters politically biased intrusions into American politics.
. Barack Obama has now decided to compete with Carter in the worst ex-president category. His speech last week at the University of Illinois went after Trump with more sustained criticisms than his prior occasional snarky sniping. His comments were a tired reprise of the usual whining from two years of NeverTrump complaints and media distortions. There was this chestnut: It should not be Democratic or Republican, it should not be partisan to say that we dont pressure the Department of Justice or the FBI to use the criminal justice system as a cudgel to punish our political opponents. Talk about hutzpah. Who was it that used the power of federal agencies to go after the Associated Press, Fox News James Rosen, and conservative Christian groups?
Or how about this howler: Or to explicitly call for the attorney general to protect members of his own party from prosecution because elections happen to be coming up. I am not making that up. That is not hypothetical. Indeed, its not hypothetical, since Obama unleashed his flunkeys in the FBI and DOJ to protect Hillary Clinton from the wages of her corruption and willful law-breaking because the 2016 presidential election happen[ed] to be coming up. But Obama played offense as well, siccing those same flunkeys on the Trump campaign, using questionable FISA warrants to surveil American citizens, and then unmasking their names. Hows that for cudgeling political opponents? Thats just a few of the 30 different scandals Matt Margolis documents in his book on Obamas scandal-ridden administration.
Then theres this decrepit argument that goes all the way back to Nixons Silent Majority, and then was freshened up by Clintons angry white men campaign tactic. You happen to be coming of age during a backlash, Obama told the Illinois U snowflakes. It did not start with Donald Trump, he is a symptom, not the cause. He is just capitalizing on resentment that politicians have been fanning for years. A fear, an anger that is rooted in our past. Ill decode this tripe for you: white men who used to be the masters of the universe are angry, fearful, and resentful about their lost white privilege, and so lash out irrationally at women and people of color. They have been especially enraged by Barack Obama, and so voted for white supremacist enabler Donald Trump in order to get some payback. Thats the simplistic psycho-babel those bright progressives have long been famous for.
Finally, we are treated to this howler:
[W]hen you hear how great the economy is doing right now, lets just remember when this recovery started. I am glad it has continued but when you hear about his economic miracle that has been going on, when the job number comes out, monthly job numbers and suddenly Republicans say it is a miracle, I have to kind of remind them, actually those job numbers were the same they were in 2015, in 2016.
Its true that all presidents take too much credit and too much blame for the economic cycles. But lets remember, the Great Recession ended in June of 2009. No one can credit Obama, since he had been in office a scant five months. Moreover, the recovery under his guidance was historically slow, including jobs recovery. So while Obama is right about the numbers of jobs created compared to Trump, he is silent on all the other Trump actions that have spurred growth: tax reductions for corporations and individuals, and pruning back growth-strangling regulations have lifted the markets animal spirits, long depressed by Obamas dirigiste policies and anti-business rhetoric. As a result, we had a second quarter GDP growth of 4.1%, with the fourth quarter estimated to be at least that high.
Throw in the booming stock market up 35% just in 2017, and record low unemployment rates, and Trumps policies have to be given credit for this dramatic swing, rather than claiming that they are predictable results of policies Obama enacted. Remember how many Obama-supporting economists like Larry Summers were predicting GDP growth rates would remain about 2.0%, the new normal? How does that gloomy forecast from economists square with the claim that Obamas actions started the trajectory of improvement that culminated under Trump? I dont recall these experts predicting the current economic boom. Perhaps their new normal was just cover for Obamas dismal record.
Based on his first foray into rallying the base for November, Obama is on track to best Jimmy Carter in the worst ex-president derby. Stale talking points, rank hypocrisy, and revisionist history will persuade only the most die-hard Obama fans. Voters who value concrete accomplishments over subjective standards of style and decorum will not be impressed. In fact, Obamas further appearances will only remind voters why they voted for Trump in the first place.
Just like Carter he’ll be a boil on the national butt for another four decades.
Obama and his minions continue to cause damage, despite the fact that he’s no longer President.
Are you kidding me? Ebola blew past Jemmah probably six months in.
There was never any question that obama knew he was doing things to the country.
It’s hard to surpass carter as a bad president. But brocko got ‘er done without batting an eye. Not only had brocko never accomplished anything prior to being elected (carter was a naval officer and a nuclear physicist), he finally made some accomplishments in office, but they were all drastically negative for the country.
And it’s hard to surpass carter as a bad ex-president (taking the side of the palestinians vs Israel, etc); but at least he has accomplished something via Habitat. brocko still hasn’t accomplished anything. He remains a guy who is famous for being famous.
Although Truman was Rat I think he's worthy of respect for many reasons.Jimmah? Obola? Gimme a break!
I firmly believe that Obola will surpass Jimmah as the worst ex-President of my lifetime just as he surpassed Jimmah as the worst *President* of my lifetime.
I remember Carter & what a mistake he was,but he can’t get much worse & Obama still can.
Barack was a far worse President than Carter... Sadly the GOP chose Romney for 2012.. so we wound up with him for 8 years... but he was a far far worse president.
Carter only managed to incompetently screw up Iran... Obama Screwed up EGYPT!!! >>> EFFFING EGYPT!!! Probably one of the most stable and western friendly governments in the Middle East.... Turned Libya into a failed state... etc etc etc...
Obama makes Carter look good...
From what I see of the Democrats they have even worse ones than Obama in their pipeline.
I don’t know that Obama was worse than Carter, Obama was the same bad for twice as long. Doubling Carter’s tenure ... would be pretty much Obama.
Fixed it
“Will” should read “has definitely”. It should noted that both are scum at the bottom of the cesspool.
I remember the company I worked for financed a $1.2 million dragline at 21 1/2 percent interest in Jimmah Cahtah’s years.
Already has.
Obama didn’t give Islamic terrorists a country. Carter is worse than Obama.
Barry Soetoro/Barack Obama stands alone as the worst usurper of all time.
He was never eligible to be President.
Um, no, Carter was never a nuclear physicist. The US Navy sent him to graduate school to study nuclear physics. He never graduated after more than two years studying for a Masters degree. He was granted a “humanitarian” discharge to almost bankrupt his daddy’s farming operations.
Carter was a planetary sucker.
Obama was a planetary failure.
Both were awarded the Noel Peace prize.
Carter, for the Egyptian-Israeli Peace Accords.
Obama, for...
I despised, and still do despise Carter. But Carter’s poor performance was due to incompetence and personal pettiness and vindictiveness.
Barack Obama’s damage was done with extreme malice, knowing full well what he was doing. He compounded it with incompetence in things he wasn’t overtly trying to destroy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.