Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kavanaugh's Accuser Agrees to Testimony...But Not by the Deadline
townhall.com ^ | 9/20/2018 | Katie Pavlich

Posted on 09/20/2018 2:48:44 PM PDT by rktman

The attorney for Christine Blasey Ford, the woman accusing Judge Brett Kavanaugh, sent a letter to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley Thursday afternoon saying her client is still willing to testify, but not by the Monday deadline and given a number of conditions.

"I would like to set up a call with you later today to discuss the conditions under which Dr. Christine Blasey Ford would be prepared to testify next week. As you are aware, she has been receiving death threats, which have been reported to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and she and her family have been forced out of their home," the letter states. "She wishes to testify, provided that we can agree on terms that are fair and which ensure her safety. A hearing on Monday is not possible and the Committee's insstence that it occur then is arbitrary in any event. Dr. Ford has asked me to let you know that she appreciates the various options you have suggested. Her strong preference continues to be for the Senate Judiciary Committee to allow for a full investigation prior to her testimony."

"Please let us know when you are available to talk to us later today," the letter concludes.

Earlier this week Ford's lawyer, Debra Katz, said her client was willing to "do whatever it takes" to make her story known and said she was ready to testify publicly.

(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: bimboerruption; christineford; kavanaughaccuser; negotiations; no; sackuppubs; vote
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-112 next last
Grassly needs to sack up and tell katz NO! Be here Monday at 8 a.m. or nothing. No more delays. No conditions set by the accuser. You don't get to do that. The committee has offered to go private, public, in d.c., in cali. Not good enough? Bye!
1 posted on 09/20/2018 2:48:44 PM PDT by rktman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rktman

NON print for those that like ads:

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2018/09/20/kavanaughs-accuser-agrees-to-testimonybut-not-on-monday-n2520948


2 posted on 09/20/2018 2:51:02 PM PDT by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

First steps in a Democrat stall. Either they’ll start out with unreasonable conditions, or they’ll change the conditions and demand new delays until after the elections.


3 posted on 09/20/2018 2:51:10 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

this is the hill the R’s may die on


4 posted on 09/20/2018 2:51:20 PM PDT by dontreadthis (A TIMELINE OF TREASON on Profile Page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Which Dim friends of hers called in the “death threats” for her?


5 posted on 09/20/2018 2:51:44 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

So far the only “evidence” is the letter to DiFi. Who won’t let anyone else see it.


6 posted on 09/20/2018 2:51:58 PM PDT by GMMC0987
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Does the FBI look in to death threats to a private citizen??

or would her local PD be the people that deal with that?


7 posted on 09/20/2018 2:52:41 PM PDT by cableguymn (We need a redneck in the white house....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Does this nutty slut run the country now??????


8 posted on 09/20/2018 2:53:01 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Too bad so sad

A day late and a dollar short

She says that she did not want to go public so therefore in her mind it was not a stop the vote issue.


9 posted on 09/20/2018 2:53:17 PM PDT by a fool in paradise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Agree 100%. The witness won’t be ‘safer’ later in the week. This is more delaying tactic. Grassley should hold the line. He has been very reasonable in his offers to the accuser.


10 posted on 09/20/2018 2:53:20 PM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wuli

Which Dim friends of hers called in the “death threats” for her?

><

That’s right. I’d bet money on it being Dems.


11 posted on 09/20/2018 2:53:35 PM PDT by laplata (Leftists/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rktman

It would surprise me if her “conditions” would result in a fair hearing of the matter.


12 posted on 09/20/2018 2:54:21 PM PDT by RatRipper (Unindicted co-conspirators: the Mainstream Media and the Democratic Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

YGBSM. Monday, under oath, or never.


13 posted on 09/20/2018 2:55:06 PM PDT by tgusa (gun control: hitting center of mass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Fakenews. Fake agreement


14 posted on 09/20/2018 2:55:17 PM PDT by conservative98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Does this nutty slut run the country now??????

><

No, but the bastard Dems who are using her and coaching her every step of the way, want to run it. She’s a Useful Idiot.


15 posted on 09/20/2018 2:55:23 PM PDT by laplata (Leftists/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dontreadthis

Grassley needs to insist on the Monday deadline. If it is so important to Ms Ford that Judge Kavanaugh not sit on the S/C, then she should show up and give her testimony. Otherwise, she is just playing political games. And I want public testimony, Anita Hill had to testify publicly and so should this person. Otherwise, this is not fair to Judge Kavanaugh or his family. Besides, sounds to me, all that happened was some rough housing by a couple of drunken kids. And, further, inquiring minds want to know, if she could not fight off one boy on top of her, how come she was able to get away with two boys on top of her? This doesn’t make any sense to me.


16 posted on 09/20/2018 2:55:31 PM PDT by erkelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Cancel everything and VOTE GRASSLEY,this is a joke!


17 posted on 09/20/2018 2:55:32 PM PDT by mdittmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cableguymn

Maybe she just provided the letter to difi so later the judge could be blackmailed during a Supreme Court case


18 posted on 09/20/2018 2:55:38 PM PDT by a fool in paradise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: laplata

Gee, they were anonymous death threats? Maybe difi has letters she’ll hold for a couple months with the actual names on them.


19 posted on 09/20/2018 2:55:53 PM PDT by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Grassley should agree to nothing without the full, inredacted text from Feinstein.


20 posted on 09/20/2018 2:56:23 PM PDT by djpg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-112 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson