Media Bias Has Real Consequences

Townhall.com ^ | September 20, 2018 | John R. Lott Jr

[Kaslin]

Media bias has real consequences. Ohio’s wealthiest supporter of the Republican party, Leslie Wexner, has withdrawn his support because he was ‘ashamed’ by President Trump’s response to the white supremacist rally in Charlottesville. Wexner announced his decision on Friday, just a day after former President Obama gave a speech in Ohio where he attacked Republicans who “try to shield and deflect oversight of [Trump’s] behavior.”

A lot of smart people seem to have fallen for the mainstream media's lies about Trump’s comments. NBC News’ coverage of Charlottesville last year was all too typical: “On Tuesday [August 15^th, 2017], Trump gave a freewheeling press conference at Trump Tower in Manhattan in which he doubled down on the remarks he made Saturday blaming ‘many sides’ after a car plowed through a group of counter-protesters who were demonstrating against an alt-right and white nationalist rally. He also equated white supremacists on the right to the ‘alt-left.’”

Obama kept repeating these claims in his speeches this month: “We’re supposed to stand up to discrimination, and we’re sure as heck supposed to stand up clearly and unequivocally to Nazi sympathizers.  How hard can that be? Saying that Nazis are bad?”

Even as events were unfolding in Charlottesville on August 12 of last year, President Trump said: “we condemn in the strongest possible terms this egregious display of hatred, bigotry and violence on many sides.” On August 14, Trump called neo-Nazis and other white supremacists “repugnant to everything we hold dear.”. He again elaborated the next day: “And you had people, and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists, because they should be condemned totally. But you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists. OK? And the press has treated them absolutely unfairly.” All three of those quotes were given before the NBC News piece quoted above. 

So where were the fact-checkers when Obama suggested that Trump has difficulty condemning Nazis?

Wexner was quoted after Obama’s talk: “I was struck by the genuineness of the man; his candor, humility and empathy for others.” 

Obama attacks Trump for dividing Americans, when that is what the former president is doing himself. Trump hasn't accused Democrats of sympathizing with monstrous, genocidal ideologies.  In his Nelson Mandela Lecture in July, Obama talked of “rabid nationalism and xenophobia and doctrines of tribal, racial, or religious superiority” and “right-wing billionaires.” Trump has never called his opponents “rabid."

Then there have been Obama’s usual, divisive attacks on Republican policies, which he thinks are all about “cutting taxes on the wealthiest Americans.” But even the liberal Tax Policy Center pointed out, “The top 1% and 0.1% of taxpayers will see their share of income taxes rise in 2018.” The mainstream media won’t critically examine Obama’s oft-repeated policy claims, which frequently carry the implication that Republicans don’t care enough about the poor, minorities, or women.

If Trump wanted to appeal to racists, why would he take such pride in continually reminding everyone that under his administration the US now has record-low unemployment rates for blacks, Hispanics and women?

It’s surreal for Obama to attack Trump for wanting to “use the criminal justice system as a cudgel to punish our political opponents.” Obama’s IRS systematically went after political opponents, and his FBI and Department of Justice spied on Trump’s presidential campaign.

Many apparently still believe that candidate Trump made fun of a disabled NY Times reporter. In fact, Trump made a type of gesture that he often used to make fun of people floundering away when faced with tough questioning. Trump used the same gesture to make fun of Sen. Ted Cruz and even himself.

The media’s false statements have gotten completely out of control. Unfortunately, the narrative that Trump has trouble condemning white supremacists is just one of many that the media repeats on so many different topics. It isn’t surprising that even many very smart people, such as Mr. Wexner, sometimes get taken in.

* Lott is the president of the Crime Prevention Research Center and the author most recently of “The War on Guns.”

[vette6387]

So tell Wexner we don’t need his ill-gotten shekels!

[TBP]

It’s been going on for decades.

[jimfree]

Wexner was making excuses. He wanted to walk away before the reporting.

[TChad]

I'm glad to see John Lott continue to write pieces on media bias in addition to his usual firearm-related articles and books.

Here is Lott on NPR and PBS:

http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/trump-budget-npr-pbs-not-public-subsidies-article-1.3007182

There is a reason why conservatives so distrust NPR. I have done thousands of radio interviews, but nothing compares to my consistent experience with NPR.

They would interview me for hours, repeating the same question over and over in the hope of getting a more acceptable answer. When that didn't work, they would selectively edit what I said to completely change the meaning.

In 2001, I finally stopped agreeing to pre-taped interviews with NPR.

In 2016, I did another interview with an NPR show under the pretext that it was a live interview. But they misled me. It was taped. In what finally appeared, first, they held a long discussion with gun-control advocates.

Then, after calling me controversial, they briefly used selected unrelated segments from my interview. Finally, they let the gun-control advocates criticize my points without being challenged. My criticisms and counterarguments were left on the cutting room floor.

Disgusting.

[conservatism_IS_compassion]

The only solution is to sue the MSM. Of course, you can’t use that name for your defendant, but that problem is easy to finesse. Your defendant is “The Associated Press and its membership individually and collectively.”

Your complaint is violation of the Sherman AntiTrust Act. Easy to show, because the AP already lost on that back in 1945. Back then, the AP was “too big to fail” - but now, with the technologies enabling the Internet, the mission of "conserving scarce, expensive bandwidth in disseminating the news” is obsolete.

[Lurkinanloomin]

response to the white supremacist rally in Charlottesville
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The author is buying in to a false narrative.
The original group that got the permit was a preservationist group that wanted to save the statues.
The event was hijacked by Soros paid agitators acting like white supremacists to set up the narrative.
Soros paid leftists showed up and the Soros directed Gov. directed the police to force the groups together to create the scene that would be used by the Ministry of Propaganda to advance the narrative that anyone supporting preservation of American history is a white supremacist.