I don’t think Trump has any recourse legally in terms of the British. His best avenue is to leak the remainder.
After all, the NYT has all of this already. Any leaks could be blamed on them.
Apparently the threat of reveal is getting the “allies” to spill the beans
“...it looks like the deep state finally got a collar on Trump.”
Not at all.
This stuff is far more damaging to the Obama co-conspirators when third parties put it out there.
As soon a Trump, his attorneys, his press secretary, his chief of staff, or anyone perceived to be a close confidant are perceived to be behind the release the impact is weakened, because its too easy for the MSM to spin it as a politically motivated disclosure.
That is why Trump has been so painstakingly “hands off” and why he distances himself from his DOJ and his FBI. That way whatever comes out will be seen as independent.
He doesn’t want even the slightest appearance of a “weaponized” DOJ or FBI - as that is what Obama was guilty of. He wants to be above reproach so that when Obama’s conspiracy comes to light, people will see a stark contrast between his ultra transparent, impartial, hands off, “let the chips fall where they may” approach to justice vs. Obama’s corrupt, manipulative, scheming, blackmailing, heavy-handed favoritism.
You sounds like a defeatist there. I see why people believe fake news. All will be revealed.
In the end it won't matter if some Brit or Aussies names are redacted, it will be obvious who they are. And the names of the US coup conspirators will be revealed no matter what.
“I don’t know what the hell is going on, but it looks like the deep state finally got a collar on Trump. I can’t believe I am saying that. “
I really think Trump maybe ‘under the gun’.
None of this is good.