Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Christine Ford, accuser of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, agrees 2 Senate testimony re sex..
cnbc ^ | Sept 22, 2018 | J David

Posted on 09/22/2018 11:38:50 AM PDT by tinyowl

Edited on 09/22/2018 12:45:01 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

Christine Blasey Ford, accuser of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, agrees to Senate testimony about sexual assault claim

  • Christine Blasey Ford, a California professor at the center of a sexual assault accusation against U.S. Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, has agreed to testify to representatives of the Senate Judiciary Committee sometime next week.
  • The details have yet to be worked out, but it could mean the end of a lengthy and emotional political fight that has stalled Kavanaugh's nomination.

    Below is the full text of the letter Ford's legal team sent to Senate staffers: [From the bottom of the link]

    Dr. Ford accepts the Committee's request to provide her first-hand knowledge of Brett Kavanaugh's sexual misconduct next week. Although many aspects of the proposal you provided via email, on September 21, 2018, at 2:33 pm, are fundamentally inconsistent with the Committee's promise of a fair, impartial investigation into her allegations, and we are disappointed with the leaks and the bullying that have tainted the process, we are hopeful that we can reach agreement on details. Can we set up a time for later this afternoon to continue our negotiations?

    Sincerely,

    Debra S. Katz

    Lisa Banks

    Excerpt from cnbc


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; brettkavanaugh; bromwichgroup; california; calstatefullerton; christineblaseyford; demsplayinggames; fakeagreement; fakenews; grassley; kavanaugh; kavanaughaccuser; kavanaughallegation; lyinglimolib; maga; michaelbromwich; mikebromwich; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 341-359 next last
To: Sarah Barracuda

She’s been saying all along that she “will testify”....

IF

“further negotiations” meet her ridiculous demands.

I don’t believe we’ll ever see her in DC.

She wants to put others under oath and create a trial atmosphere where her recollection is unassailably true, whether she has any details or not. And every denial is untrue, and an assault on all the female victims of the me too generation. From Great Grandma to those just being born.

And I hate to think Republicans will go along with that. But we have seen nothing from them yet.


41 posted on 09/22/2018 11:46:51 AM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tinyowl

I’ll believe it when I see it. Is there anything out there saying that she has accepted the terms of testifying first and being questioned by a female attorney?


42 posted on 09/22/2018 11:47:02 AM PDT by BlackAdderess (Get to your polling place this November by any means necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EnquiringMind

Will they have to publicly apologize, and denounce their male white privilege, before she takes the stand.


43 posted on 09/22/2018 11:47:08 AM PDT by Leep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: tinyowl
"Dr. Ford accepts the Committee’s request to provide her first-hand knowledge of Brett Kavanaugh’s sexual misconduct next week...we are hopeful that we can reach agreement on details."

This is the same crap! What's new about it? She "accepts" as long as her lengthy list of demands is met.

44 posted on 09/22/2018 11:47:34 AM PDT by Trump20162020
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda
Ryan Saavedra 🇺🇸 ‏ Verified account @RealSaavedra 5s 6 seconds ago More BREAKING: Christine Blasey Ford’s lawyers say she accepts the Senate Judiciary Committee’s invitation to testify next week but she requests further negotiations over details of the hearing. Which means..she wants HER demands to be met BEFORE she will testify


45 posted on 09/22/2018 11:47:38 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks ( The US Constitution ....... Invented by geniuses and God .... Administered by morons ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator

Admin’s could you perhaps put the title of the thread in quotes? It’s a little misleading probably without them. Up to you! Thanks!


46 posted on 09/22/2018 11:47:43 AM PDT by tinyowl (A is A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CMailBag

Judge Pirro, Judge Judy, and Coulter.


47 posted on 09/22/2018 11:48:06 AM PDT by Reno89519 (No Amnesty! No Catch-and-Release! Just Say No to All Illegal Aliens! Arrest & Deport!y)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda
but she requests further negotiations over details of the hearing

hell NO !

This mockery has gone on about 3 weeks too long .. gawd how I hate those Rat bastards !

48 posted on 09/22/2018 11:48:07 AM PDT by tomkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tinyowl

who is Christine? A friend we know?


49 posted on 09/22/2018 11:48:09 AM PDT by snarkytart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

If Grassley has kept to the last deadline, we would nor be here now. This is ludicrous. I have no faith in Grassley, the Republicans, or the government.


50 posted on 09/22/2018 11:48:27 AM PDT by djpg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda

ENOUGH with these games!!!


51 posted on 09/22/2018 11:48:30 AM PDT by shanover (...To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.-S.Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tinyowl

I think this is nothing more than a way to prevent the Monday vote. I don’t think she will ever show. They should have let the last deadline pass and taken that Monday vote.


52 posted on 09/22/2018 11:48:31 AM PDT by BlackAdderess (Get to your polling place this November by any means necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #53 Removed by Moderator

To: Sarah Barracuda

Delay, delay it’s all about delaying!!! They are playing this PREFECTLY BRILLIANTLY! They have the spineless asses right where they want them!! 3 datelines and still negotiating.... imbeciles!


54 posted on 09/22/2018 11:48:49 AM PDT by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tinyowl

More stall


55 posted on 09/22/2018 11:48:54 AM PDT by joshua c
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlackAdderess

She hasn’t made an actual allegation in anything remotely resembling a legitimate legal format. No police report, no sworn statement ... nothing of the sort.


56 posted on 09/22/2018 11:49:00 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("The Russians escaped while we weren't watching them ... like Russians will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: tinyowl

If “justice delayed is justice denied”, and no charges were made in the 1980’s (and we don’t even know what year), then WHO is being denied justice? If Kavanaugh could have cleared his name in he 1980’s, isn’t HIS justice being denied?


57 posted on 09/22/2018 11:49:05 AM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5

Wai....wut? I missed that. It is on that blogger’s page with the yearbook.


58 posted on 09/22/2018 11:49:06 AM PDT by RushIsMyTeddyBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: tinyowl

I read the letter and they didn’t agree to anything. This is an obvious stalling tactic. How do you agree to something and then state that you only agree to it if you will get the conditions you have demanded all along. If the committee accepts this than I have lost all respect for them.


59 posted on 09/22/2018 11:49:29 AM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
And I hate to think Republicans will go along with that. But we have seen nothing from them yet.

Republicans have been stupid from the start. (Either that or they never wanted Kavanaugh--and I'm beginning to suspect that.) Their first mistake was taking too long to get the hearings started. It's as though this was their first rodeo. Like they didn't know the Demoncrats were going to play the delay-and-accusation game. Where have they been? Grassley is a damn fool. I wish he'd prove me wrong, but he won't.


60 posted on 09/22/2018 11:49:58 AM PDT by Cinnamontea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 341-359 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson