Posted on 09/24/2018 10:45:41 AM PDT by fishtank
Fat Chance: Evolutionists Push Date of Soft Tissue Back 558 Million Years
September 22, 2018 | David F. Coppedge
The latest find of original molecules in a fossil should falsify long ages, but the discoverers use it to celebrate Darwinian evolution.
(Excerpt) Read more at crev.info ...
I think they claim they found cholesterol, a strictly animal steroidal compound according to accepted biochemistry, from which other animal hormones are made.
Christianity requires faith.
Evolution requires faith.
It is a non-replicable, non-observable poly-hypothesis masqueraded - and paraded - not even anymore as theory but as fact.
Using the actual scientific method, prove evolution.
Hint: Intra-species adaptation is not (macro-) evolution.
Whatever.
C. S. Lewis called it many decades ago:
The atheist, secularist left seeks to overwhelm dissent with “Bigness”; in this case, just piling on such a big number of years that somehow whatever they say happened must - presto! - have happened.
My first-year biology professor, when I was a science major, had a pet phrase: “Given time and chance, we are confident that...” [fill in the blank with some evolutionary supposition]. Gee, kinda sounds like the words of FAITH, not SCIENCE.
Evolution is like waving a magic wand while saying Abra Kadabra, and while distracting the audience with bigness of numbers and minutiae of facts - none of which actually prove the ostensible theory.
(Meanwhile, they are also distracting from all the facts that disagree with the supposed theory.)
A group or men declare evolution to be established fact (truth), so that’s it, huh?
Nope.
No. The Chicago statement reflects a very good example of diligent homework.
Contrary wise to evolutionist, on there own, hundreds of millions of years is way overdue time for all life to be well disappeared.
Are you a Christian?
But concerning the resurrection of the dead, haven’t you read that which was spoken to you by God, saying Matt 22:31
Heres a homework exercise: write out 25 observations on that verse about Jesuss attitude about Scripture.
Would you like to do that? It would be beneficial.
“Are you a Christian?”
Nope. I was, but gave it up. Went through the whole Catholic program, CCD, batism, confirmation, private Catholic school for several years...
But took a long, hard look as an adult, and came to the conclusion that it’s a cult. I believe some of the bible, but not a lot. Like the resurection. Virgin birth. Nope.
I believe Jesus was a great man, but not God. The fest, selective stories that embelish, to form and keep a legend great enough to found a church, run by flawed men on a power trip.
The RCC is simply incompetent to teach the Scriptures.
They are as bad or worse than the scribes and the Pharisees were in the days of Jesus.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.