Posted on 09/24/2018 11:08:51 AM PDT by detective
The two women making sexual misconduct allegations against Brett Kavanaugh claim to have witnesses, but so far, all of their witnesses back Kavanaughs claim that nothing happened.
It might be difficult to remember this as Democrats and the media throw around phrases like second accuser and attempted sexual assault and exposing himself against the Supreme Court nominee. But the facts are still the facts, and every single witness named so far by both accusers say they witnessed nothing of the sort.
The first accuser, Christine Blasey Ford, is accusing Kavanaugh of attempting to assault her at a house party in 1982 when she was 15 and he was 17. She named three people who were at the party: PJ Smyth, Mark Judge, and Leland Ingham Keyser.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Once you separate the media sensationalism and the political posturing from the actual facts, what we have here is a remarkable situation where every witness named by Kavanaughs accusers sides with Kavanaugh.
Every woman who has known Brett Kavanaugh has nothing but good things to say about him.
The accusations against Brett Kavanaugh are so transparently dishonest and so obviously politically motivated that they rise to the level of slander.
But her allegation has a “ring of truth”!!!
/s
lol
Next thing you know some loon will “come forward” with accusations that Kavanaugh called her “poopy head” when they were in first grade!!!
Well, they’ll try to scrub that ring out.
Yeah but that Hawaii Senator wont believe the allegations against Keith Ellison, he still has his cushy job
The allegations against the muslim Ellison are from a crazy woman who only has police reports, pictures and doctors notes to back up her frivolous baseless claim.
> Every Witness Named by Kavanaughs Accusers Sides with Kavanaugh
Dems: That proves she’s telling the truth.
Me: *no response yet. still trying to figure out what DiFi et al are smoking. weed doesn’t explain it.*
So, the New Yorker knew the allegations were crap before they printed the story.
We shouldn’t forget Juanita Brodderick (The spelling may be incorrect.) She accused Bill Clinton of rape.
To quote an esteemed NY Senator “I believe in him because he is telling the truth”
With the Ford allegation, people she named to the Washington Post as "corroborating witnesses" came out with public denials AFTER they learned that they were the "unnamed witnesses" in the Washington Post story.
With the Ramirez allegation, the story was so ludicrous that the denials of the people she named as witnesses were noted right in the body of the New Yorker article.
Glad that neither Kavanaugh or Trump are wimps. The Senate needs to take some testosterone meds.
Republicans who support Trump and not suppose to be allowed to dine in public, are not suppose to be allowed to walk the streets, are suppose to have their children threatened and humiliated. Some even want public violence against those that support President Trump.
Why should with type of political hatred anyone be surprised at what the Democrats are trying to do to a Supreme Court judge. Again, this has nothing to do with justice, truth or fairness.
I am so beyond angry, that I want the Weaponized FBI/DOJ/foreign intelligence community to spy on and trap all senior Democrats and to to them what was done to General Flynn.
Dianne F and her Chinese spy driver should be an easy way to take down that Senator. It is time for Democrats to see what a witch hunt really looks like and why they should sponsor bipartisan legislation that will stop and depoliticize the nations security and law enforcement agencies.
bkmk
Perhaps she was not born yet when the Duke LaCrosse team was accused. Or the man at Oberlin College. Or the football players at Sacred Heart University. Or Tawana Brawley.
Very good!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.