Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mariner

[More nonsense.

They would not be able to hide that arsenal from US surveillance. US intelligence pegs them below 300, mostly tactical.]


The way US surveillance was unable to predict the Indian, Pakistani and North Korean tests, I’d be leery of anything it says re foreign nuclear capabilities, especially with respect to a Chinese state that has enacted severe penalties against the disclosure something as commonplace as economic statistics. Note the wholesale rollup of Chinese agents, thanks possibly to Hillary’s use of a private (and penetrated) e-mail server.

The US intelligence services are probably the worst of all the major powers, except in wartime sigint and satellite intel. And even the latter were unable to prevent the shootdown of a stealth warplane operated by an adversary with 2% of the population of the US, and whose principal export was the Yugo. Then there was the miscued targeting of the Chinese Embassy in Belgrade.


22 posted on 09/24/2018 3:55:49 PM PDT by Zhang Fei (They can have my pitbull when they pry his cold dead jaws off my ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Zhang Fei

“sigint and satellite intel”

That’s how you find Nuke delivery systems.

Believe as you wish.


31 posted on 09/24/2018 4:07:23 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: Zhang Fei
"...Then there was the miscued targeting of the Chinese Embassy in Belgrade.//"

What it indeed "miscued"?

I say Hmmmmm.

53 posted on 09/27/2018 5:05:36 AM PDT by T-Bone Texan (I posit that there IS something left worth fighting for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson