Posted on 09/24/2018 5:33:58 PM PDT by kingattax
The Senate Judiciary Committee led by Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA) agreed today to use prosecutor experienced in sex-crimes to serve as an investigative staff counsel for the hearing.
Christine Ford accused Judge Brett Kavanaugh of sexual abuse 36 years ago at an unknown place or time. Since then her named witnesses, including a female friend, have ALL denied the woman’s accusations.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Just when the goal is in sight for poor Kavanaugh, the feckless dunce and swamp dweller Grassley moves the goal posts.
Grassley is a quisling for the democrats.
What the hell are you talking about?
Rereading my post, the intent seems to be quite obvious.
If you’d like to be more specific, I’ll be only too happy to reply.
How did Grassley “move the goalposts?”
IF she shows up, and that’s a big “IF”, I predict she will be in tears after the first 2 minutes. How will the Repubs respond if she breaks down and cries????????????
They will have to postpone their questions. The DEMS will holler and howl.
It is just going to a be a circus.
That’s why I think she will appear......because they don’t intend for Judge K have his say.
He’s allowed this female character to string along her baloney all the way to Thursday. Then, when another girl comes out of the woodwork, he allows talk of even further delays. He should put his foot down and say, “Vavanaugh’s vote will be ‘x’ and that’s it. End of story.”
He’s being far too wishy-washy with these fakers, and the democrats clearly and unmistakably intend to string this whole thing along as long as possible ad infinitum.
Was it a Yugo?
That might not be enough. Was Kavanaugh ever around Ford?
“and in other news today, sources can confirm that former senator Flake is under FBI investigation for kitty porn.”
I’ve heard that the investigations into the murders of Harvey Milk and George Moscone are being reopened and senator dianne frankenswine is the prime suspect.
So is every democrat on the committee.... But that little old law isn’t stopping them now is it?
Laws for thee, not for we.
Isn’t there another week required between a committee vote and the full Senate consideration?
“If Ms. Ford, who walked out of a bedroom unhindered and 10 minutes later walked out of the house unhindered, felt her life was in danger, that she might be killed, why did she leave her bestie girlfriend of all time alone with those exact same men? Why didn’t she grab her arm and drag her out, too?”
Great and important question. I have a similar important question.
There is a party with 5 people 3 boys and 2 girls. (This is the latest Ford version and not the therapist version.) Ford left the party somehow - the circumstances matter. If she left without saying anything - wouldn’t everyone wonder what happened to Chrissie? Her friend would have called her the next day. It is impossible to fathom that the only other girl disappears with no questions asked.
I would like to share this with Bagster to see if it is Oracle worthy.
THAT is funny. I wish I could be that creative.
:)
Grassley doesn’t have enough votes (yet) from Republicans on the Judiciary Committee. What should he do — waterboard Jeff Flake until he votes to recommend Kavanaugh’s confirmation?
That sounds like a plan.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.