[lightman]

If the Senate GOP had one pair between them all they would demand: UNDER OATH or NOT AT ALL.

[Kickass Conservative]

If testifying Under Oath is good enough for Judge Judy, it had better be good enough for the United States Senate.

[cymbeline]

“UNDER OATH or NOT AT ALL”

Are the current terms that she will not be under oath?

[MplsSteve]

“If the Senate GOP had one pair between them all they would demand: UNDER OATH or NOT AT ALL.”

Agreed. And not just Ford but Avenatti and the skank he’s claiming to represent as well as Ramirez, the woman who became the second “accuser”.

BTW, let’s double down on this too. Issue subpoenas to all of them today with instructions to be at the hearing on Thursday.