Her refutation: It must have been another year.
She said that it happened when she was 15.
She’d have to say she was a different age.
She was born in November 1966. She has insisted she was 15. She was 15 in the summer of 1982. Not 1981. Not 1983. If she wants, she can change her story (again), but that leads to complications.
Or he purposely kept a false calendar. I mean, they’ll try everything and anything...
As I recall vividly in the Clarence Thomas confirmation debacle, on the Saturday that Thomas testified in rebuttal, outside the hearing room the Anita Hill forces held a press conference and announced that she had passed a polygraph. They never released the questions or any of the supporting data, yet the press reported that she had "passed a polygraph exam." What they should have reported is that "her backers held a press conference and claimed that she had passed a polygraph exam."
One of the bigger problems with an issue like this is the general public doesn't know what evidence is. They don't know the rules of evidence that apply in courtrooms, and they do not understand hearsay limitations.
Whre is July and August. How do we know it’s June?
Lesson, never take on a person with personal calendars from 36 years ago!
He will have that year, too. He’s OCD.
Also, he has established a pattern of writing everything down. It’s not just what IS on this calendar. His meticulous nature rules out things that are not there.