Posted on 09/26/2018 10:54:45 AM PDT by TigerClaws
In the wake of the 3rd Kavanaugh accuser Julie Swetnick's identity becoming public through her lawyer, Michael Avenatti, The Kuhner Report received a call from a man who identified himself as "Thomas in Boston," whose family knew the Swetnicks "Well" in Maryland, and discussed the known "Issues of Substance abuse," and "Mental Issues from Julie." He detailed a phone call from his sister this morning, who still lives in Maryland, where she said "Can you imagine a more delusional whack job is the one that came forward against Kavanaugh?"
"Thomas" also went on to describe the are where they grew up in Montgomery Village, "Quite a distance from Bethesda" and that the "Social circles" would not have interacted. He refutes that during High School "No way that she would have encountered these same social circles, certainly not during High School."
He did say the information he received was "Second hand," as it came from family members, but, he also offered details of the Swetnicks and his own family that lend credence to his story.
You can hear "Thomas in Boston" below:
The same way many others get (and keep forever) security clearances they should have never been granted... the system is jacked up.
The Kuhner Report (Jeff Kuhner) is legit, who knows about the caller?
Wasn’t part of the accusations against the Duke lax players was they got the girl drunk first?
WRKO is legit, at least.
Yes, I have been mailing someone on this board. They point out Gaithersburg High and Bethesda private school ain’t exactly the same social circles.
I liked how she kept going to drunken gang rape parties until she got raped. Seems plausible...
.
.
.
LOL
Re her taxes:
Judgment Event Type:
Recorded Lien
Judgment Against: Swetnick, Julie
Judgment in Favor of: Comptroller of Maryland - Annapolis
Judgment Ordered Date: 10/02/2015
Judgment Entry Date: 10/02/2015
PostJudgment Interest:
Principal Amount: $62,821.03 PreJudgment Interest:
Other Fee: Service Fee:
Appearance Fee: Witness Fee:
Filing Fee: Attorney Fee:
Amount of Judgment: $62,821.03 Total Indexed Judgment: $62,821.03
Judgment Status Status Date
Entered 10/02/2015
Demographics between Mont Village and Chevy Chase have change a lot in 40 years ... just sayin
To the extent these things occurred, the RUMOR MILL would have been RAMPANT with DETAILS
I remember a couple of coeds who pulled trains and were kicked out of college for “promiscuity” Word travels fast with these things, esp at HS and college ages. Both guys AND girls talk. And that’s how I found out about them, and how the administrators found out.
With respect to one of them, to this day I still remember many of the details (date, day of week, who told, what fraternity was involved, the girl’s name, her hometown, etc.) My buddy who I keep in touch with was with me at the time the Big Deal was being told to EVERYONE. Yet he, who possesses a great memory, has zero recollection. Time fades, facts get lost, people forget or don’t care to remember. My buddy couldn’t begin to pass information on to someone if this girl was up for the SC. I could, because I have enough details and could find those would could verify. Ford, Rameriz, et al can’t remember squat because it DIDN’T HAPPEN.
You just don’t keep stuff like this quiet, especially contemporaneously.
more definitive information about what?
True, but she claims to have observed guys lining up outside the door, something she would not have seen if she was in the bed room herself.
No victim.
No other witnesses.
No location.
No date or time.
No police reports.
No names of the boys in line.
No friend she told about the party.
No nuthin’ but an excuse to delay the vote until after the mid-terms.
When someone says she has a security clearance with the U.S. Mint, she makes it sound like she's walking around inside a place where she has access to piles of $100 bills. She doesn't.
Hardly. The guy knew her parents well. Had long discussions with Swetnick's father about his work on the Manhattan project. Way more credible than Julie's rape fantasies.
Hysterical, delusional people are now considered as calm, sane people when they lie about Republicans.
Even if she isn’t, none of what she said adds up. She said “many women were gang raped” Oh really. So were are they? How come they never went to the police? How come nobody was arrested? Any police reports about it? Any complaints to anybody? Strange that all these women didn’t say a word about this, I mean it’s only GANG RAPE OF MULTIPLE WOMEN. And gee pretty strange that law students would be so incredibly insane to risk their law career like this not to mention their freedom. I’m going with whack job
Jim's kilt is on backwards.
If Sweatnik was 18+ (as her timeline indicates) and she was at parties with a bunch of high school kids where she participated in this sort of thing, she could probably be investigated for possible charges of statutory rape just on the basis of her sworn statement.
That is a gross understatement.
Somebody has pointed out the age issues and that the dates don’t line up. She would have already been in college. Going to supposed underage high school students’ drunken sex parties? And went for a couple of years and now claims rape? Not believable.
That is exactly correct! On another thread, I pointed out that I grew up and went to high school in Bethesda, maybe seven miles from Georgetown Prep, and that I lived much closer that that. People from Georgetown Prep and Holton Arms were in a totally different world and traveled in completely different circles. I never once bumped into anyone from either school at any party I can remember. Preppies are very, very snobbish, and Gathersburg High School was considered to be the equivalent of West Virginia in the social rankings of the time. It is inconceivable to me that Sweatnick would be a regular at parties with students from Georgetown Prep.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.