So lets just say the incident ford recalls happened but it wa not Jusge Kvvanaugh but the 2 other men. Did she think they would ever come forward?
If they are deemed believable by the committee (they have had multiple interviews and signed a statement) what kind of wrinkle does this put into the hearing?
Here is the thing. She says she knows one of the men and it was not him. Well she only mentioned Judge and Kavanaugh as being the only people she could remember. Well this guy says he was there and she cannot remember him? I don’t think so.
You know as well I do the Rats hoped this nomination would be sunk under the weight of multiplying accusations.
That’s been nipped in the bud and their star witness is left slowly twisting in the wind.
If the two men who just came forward about their having relations with Ford, then this Ford has just crashed and burned, along with her shister attorney, the media, all those aholes who signed the NY Times add (1600 men), all those who supported her in other ads or notices, the Democrat politicians, the leftist media, and other dupes, fools, and jerks in the background.
I hope this turns out to be a Ford head-on crash with a wall like that of a 200 MPH Indy race-car that went out of control. No survivor, please. Take them all down, and since we have many of their names, remind people of what fools they are.
Well, it just goes to prove that Judge Kavanaugh is guilty! After all, since these two men did it, that means that any and all men could do it. Since Judge Kavanaugh is a man, therefore he is guilty even if he did nothing! Since he is guilty (of being a man), he simply cannot be on the Supreme Court. (Dhimmicrap logic)
“If they are deemed believable by the committee...”
It is axiomatic that they are as believable as Ford.
It won’t change any Democrat votes.