People are focused on a Supreme Court seat. They are loosing the big picture. Things have escalated to a point of almost no return, and the divide between Americans grows. The author correctly points out, that evidence of being incorrect about her claims, even evidence that it has been a staged hit job, WILL NOT CHANGE THE MINDS OF THE LIBERALS. I assure you that they will say that the it was a ‘necessary process’ to keep a Conservative from the bench and thwart the will of the people. Much like the voter fraud, money schemes, and illegal donors, political spying.
That’s the real ‘big picture’. The leftist media, Fake news, Hollywood, scamming non-profits, deep state, pedophiles, sexual deviants, criminals, and Communists/Socialists do not care about what is just. They want power over you, they want to tell you how to live, and they want your tax money. They already have no moral compass, they don’t care about the Republic of the United States or it’s Constitution. They want to destroy it all, seize power, and subjugate the ‘deplorables’. Yes, if your reading this on Free Republic, you are a deplorable.
The big picture is that the left has led to a path that will only end in Civil Conflict. Yes, I am talking about the kind of conflict that will bring horror not just to our homes and shores, but to the entire free world that the United States protects. We need to talk not about surviving the event, or winning the event, but how to minimize the bloodshed that the left and the illegal government is leading us to. Kavanaugh is small symptom of a very serious disease that will kill the republic.
SJW, Antifa, Communists, Fascists are united together, much like in the early 1930’s, poised to destroy a Republic. Hell will follow.
Excellent points.
Minimize what they plan for US, and MAXIMIZE the ruin we bring on them.
We are at the Rubicon.
Lock and load.
Scientific Method, on the other hand, is a discipline designed to grant scientific justification for a hypothesis. Scientific Method questions the validity of the hypothesis, and then provides a rational process to validate it, review it, and duplicate it BEFORE it is accepted. Needless to say a “scientific consensus” would never pass the tests of Scientific Method and should have been rejected before it ever saw the light of day.
Applying that type of discipline to current events analysis is much too time consuming and/or expensive to ever be used by journalists or politicians before they write their articles or vote on legislation and, therefore, ignored in favor of consensus. The Law of Unintended Consequences is rife with examples of this lazy thinking.