Posted on 09/30/2018 9:45:05 AM PDT by jazusamo
The performance of women this week – from Senator Dianne Feinstein to Christine Blasey Ford to the howling mobs on Capitol Hill – made me seriously consider surgically altering my sex. They are demanding special treatment because of their sex and in the process placing all of us – male and female alike – at peril of witch hunts against men and then, in time, against all who will not bow to their rule.
My Facebook friend Alex Bensky reminded me of the advantage to me of transgendering:
Ah, then we'd be unable to criticize your politics, your social viewpoints, your choice of teams to root for, and anything else you say because we'd be transphobic.
As a footnote, I've seen an estimate that the transgender population is about 0.05% of the population. This is hardly a warrant for beating up people but it is not clear to me why unless we substantially alter social arrangements that have existed in almost every known human society and celebrate...not just accept but celebrate...transgenderism, we are mean, hateful people.
Victor Davis Hanson offered up the most succinct summaryof Blasey Ford's testimony:
The "process" of memorializing Ford's testimony involved a strange inversion of constitutional norms: The idea of a statute of limitations is ossified; hearsay is legitimate testimony; inexact and contradictory recall is proof of trauma, and therefore of validity; the burden of proof is on the accused, not the accuser; detail and evidence are subordinated to assumed sincerity; proof that one later relates an allegation to another is considered proof that the assault actually occurred in the manner alleged; motive is largely irrelevant; the accuser establishes the guidelines of the state's investigation of the allegations; and the individual allegation gains credence by cosmic resonance with all other such similar allegations.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Clarice Ping!
What about all of those “transphobic” lesbians, who claim that “transgender women” are out to rape all of them and organize in big protests over the notion?
bmp
"If there is no God, everything is permitted." - Fyodor Dostoevsky
Excellent term, Gynocracy. It is without due process or a Bill of Rights. Men need to be castrati, and de-testosteroned at birth.Just like there is one law for racial minorities and another for White ciizens, there will be one law for women ( no due process allowed) and another law for men ( Guilty until proven innocent.)
I have been calling them Liberal fascist femino-nazi pu$$y whippers, but I like your term Gynocracy. How deep is the State Gynocracy?
Drain that swamp!
Deep Gynocracy wants to come to a venue near you!
Some of my best friends are Gyno-Americans.
The feminazi’s are now gynocracy storm troopers. Anything to castrate the men who would not give them a second look thru their lives because the all looked like men in wigs
Yes it is an excellent term, Clarice nailed it.
FWIW, if men become the sex objects, subject to solicitations for sex anywhere and anytime, my nephews say they’re in.
The Front Hole Party- Where #meetoo flows like a constant heavy menstrual cycle.
I’m all for being whatever possibly results in reduced the Left to weepy pathetic calls for safe spaces. Or just defeats and offends them, much as the guy said in the movie “220, 221, whatever it takes.”
(Yes, I know what I’ve done)
Gynocracy-perfect. LOL
I thought that Modern Women are supposed to be strong women. Yet what we saw last week demonstrated a weak, fragile childlike woman. She was pandered too, so not to cause damage.
It is all manipulation.
I think many of us have gone thru a lot worse trauma than what Ms Ford is claiming. Its life and we move on.
“Be careful what you wish for” never held more meaning than the travesty perpetrated by the left this past week. The damage they caused, the harm they unleashed will resonate for decades.
No man is safe against the unsubstantiated claims of ANY woman. No matter how fanciful. No matter how absurd.
The obvious defense against this will be the segregating of sexes. Not at all unlike the muzzies who separate the sexes, and in doing so have permanently defined a second-class status for females, men will increasingly shy away from females as inherently dangerous and perilous.
Nothing good can come from this - except perhaps the disaffection of the American people to the hideous dhimmicrat party.
I have yet to meet a lesbian who is agnostic about men. Most hate men. Makes you wonder why?
Maybe the old traditions of no sex before marriage have merits?
Agreed...For a woman with a PhD in psychology she was way too fragile, she rehearsed hard for that performance and had good coaching as well IMHO.
Sounds expensive. No need to alter anything.
Just take a note from the mudslime book on divorce:
Say three times: "I am [fill in desired sex]".
And, there you go! (your welcome)
And yet the most man-hating of them all tend to dress, appear, and act like men. Wonder why indeed?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.