Posted on 09/30/2018 8:54:49 PM PDT by bitt
After a careful review of all of the evidence put fourth by Dr. Christine Blasey Ford in her accusations of sexual assault against Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh, sex crimes prosecutor Rachel Mitchell has released a report which completely exonerates the judge.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DoZEI_mU0AIP5wG.jpg
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
BREAKING: Sex Crimes Prosecutor Rachel Mitchell COMPLETELY EXONERATES Judge Kavanaugh in NEW REPORT!
ONE good report...let’s see what the FBI has to say..
Again?
So that’s why she was. Hosed???
Except that GP = grain of salt
That’s why she was there...
But this will not be in the media.
Typical overreach by GP. Hey dummies! She has no authority to exonerate. That website has become nearly unbearable.
Then the FBI should start digging deeper into his kindergarten years.
Clickbait
Someone needs to highlight the last statement on page five. Influence of Dems and attorneys.
Yep. She did that right after the Committee voted. So five or eight more days, lots of noise, maybe, then a final vote *or else*.
Until Judge Kavanaugh is confirmed, there are plenty of nonpolitical things to do for me and mine.
Exonerated are not, Rachel Mitchell did a terrible job in questioning Christine Ford.
There were numerous times she could have zeroed in on inconsistencies or oddities in Ford’s testimony.
For instance, she could have challenged Ford on her ability to remember that she only had 1 beer, but not who took her home.
In other words, she could have highlighted the questionable responses from Ford in such a way that the audience at home could recognize them.
“Rachel Mitchell sums up her report on Page 2, in saying “I do not think that a reasonable prosecutor would bring this case based on the evidence before the committee. Nor do I believe that this evidence is sufficient to satisfy the preponderance-of-the-evidence standard.”
Neither on a criminal or civil standard is the evidence sufficient. That’s gotta hurt Dims.
Force it in. have every republican who is invited on a show bring it up. have trump re-tweet it..
read the report that is linked. it’s real.
I’ve no doubt it’s a real report. But it’s meaningless because she has no controlling legal authority.
No, this is dated Sept. 30.
Obviously you didn’t read it.
Better yet, I’ll give you squirrels links to the docs so you can bypass the ‘clickbait’
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
“It appears that Rachel Mitchell finds Ford’s allegations totally suspect, potentially fraudulent”
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DoZEI_mU0AIP5wG.jpg
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DoZEJbPUUAAzU46.jpg
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DoZEJ7VU4AAWRYF.jpg
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DoZEKibUwAECED8.jpg
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
