Posted on 10/03/2018 7:27:33 AM PDT by TigerClaws
The decision by Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Charles E. Grassley to have Arizona sex crimes prosecutor Rachel Mitchell question Christine Blasey Ford may well be remembered as a brilliant — and quite possibly pivotal — choice.
No doubt, allowing Mitchell to ask questions instead of Republican senators served a defensive purpose, avoiding the spectacle of a bunch of old, white men publicly questioning a woman who says she was a victim of sexual abuse. But Mitchell’s methodical, genial approach left many supporters of Supreme Court nominee Brett M. Kavanaugh deeply frustrated, with some complaining that Mitchell was “not laying a glove” on Ford.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
Yes. Trace the accounts that ‘donated’ the money to her. Dem operation uses pre-paid credit cards. Follow the money.
Ford also said “Silicon Valley” people were going to step in and pay all her expenses. Who is that?
How’d she clear her entire social media profile and how’d her criminal charges in North Carolina disappear?
I just wish the FBI investigation would continue another few weeks because this is destroying the Democrats for midterms. They’re toast.
I wish Rachel would have said she committed PERJURY!!!
Why would you want to do a thing like that when you can let the FBI investigators that the Democrats and the media were loudly demanding to investigate do it for you
The Democrats are really stupid people
All these pc senators tip toeing around said Ford was credible. She was not credible. But she came across as a sympathetic figure. That’s a big difference.
The senators will determine if she perjured herself.
We in a whole new ball game with Trump in the driver's seat.
Two good reads now from USA TODAY and WAPOOP. People are getting it, the pollsters are telling the Dems the reality and the media is looking for another scandal to create... Trump Taxes.
wow, that is the first time I saw that document!
I admit to having my fainting couch at the ready, and my pearls were thoroughly clutched.
No disrespect meant on the “Hold on there Skippy.”
I removed all bricks from my office so I wouldn’t throw them through the tv.
you weren’t the only one. Every talking head was saying it was a disaster for the Republicans. Turns out almost everyone missed it. It was a brilliant move.
I think you’re right. It’s a fraud by the underworld in some way — or it can be used too easily for that purpose.
I just don’t think the average little citizen can comprehend Ms. Mitchell’s questioning. It was drawn out (no fault of her) and did not hit hot buttons the American people expect.
Man, the comment section there makes my head hurt. They’re not even listening to what the article is saying and most just respond with some version of, “This author is a clown. Get rid of him.”
That's easy to answer. She had about 20,000 donors averaging about $40 a piece. There are probably 20,000,000 potential donors in the pool of liberals/leftists. I am only surprised that she did not get more donations.
Good...that should be easy to prove then.
I was positive that she empathized with Ford too.
I notice now that Dana Perino is saying nice things about Trump. I think Chris Wallace did too. And Graham is his friend now? Did we just phase into an alternative universe?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.