Posted on 10/03/2018 1:49:37 PM PDT by kevcol
Martha Stewart begs to differ.
Charge her with obstruction.
They know very soon no one will care or want them.
That ship has sailed and you weren't on it.
I thought she was all “civic duty”, and stuff...
So she coached someone how to pass a polygraph. Her “PhD was in Educational Psychology. That probably means she know how to answer a therapist’s questions to get one to agree with her story. I’ve been convinced on seeing the beginning of her testimony she is an actress and pathological liar.
If she has any brains, she’ll get some new lawyers, roll on her previous set, and throw herself on the mercy of the committee.
Just who does she think she is?
Yes, what you said:
Ford wants to correct her testimony as well as add some “new” details.
I hope the FBI does NOT interview her. Just get the records Grassley wants and tell her they are done, and will base their conclusions (HA - The FBI supposedly doesn’t draw conclusions, right?) on her testimony to the senate committee last week.
That should give them all a big shiver. Ford and her attorneys might be scared into doing getting “inebriated”, themselves.
So now the Pharisee and his harlot decide that the Senate Committee has no right to evidence they want to see?
Breathtaking.
She really really really wants and FBI interview why? I think that late boyfriend reveal was a setup part of her plan to get an interview and now this.
Don’t believe or trust her, her attorneys or her boyfriend with his timing.
She’s still pissed about the lack of trains to Hawaii.
That excuse quickly became inoperative when it was pointed out to them that Ford waived any claim to the confidentiality of those records when she gave copies of them to the Washington Post.
So this week they're taking this position: "We know we have to turn them over, but we'll use them as a negotiating ploy to get another interview for our client where she can fabricate more details that were somehow overlooked before."
She should get an FBI interview in a room with plumbing and a hose. She shouldn’t worry about getting too wet - she’ll have a protective cloth over her.
Wait, what? Recused?
They know that’s not going to happen, so this is just for optics. If she’s charged with lying under oath, I’m guessing they’ll refuse for an entirely DIFFERENT reason. Shysters!
Why would the FBI need to interview someone that CONFESSED ON TV??
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.