Now remember: before you post a reply, ask yourself, "Did I read the article, .... or not?"
Now remember: before you post a reply, ask yourself, "Did I read the article, .... or not?"
Just ask yourself:
DIRTAON ???
Thanks for posting this
If evolution was true, then why did apes & humans stop evolving?
Good by brother chimp, I hardly knew ye.
“Now remember: before you post a reply, ask yourself, “Did I read the article, .... or not?” “
Why would I want to read fake science?
I did not read this article and only looked at that graphic. The assertion that the evos “need” 98.5% etc is goofy.
Creationists are like people with bad breath. You mostly just let them be, but every once in a while you try to gently tell them about their breath. They don’t smell the stench, so they continue believing they have breath as sweet as roses. You could probably sit them down with all their friends and convince them of their halitosis, except their mother also had bad breath, and told taught them to be paranoid and defensive. They are ruined for life. It’s really sad, but at least it gives normal people something amusing to talk about.
I did not read the article, but believe in creation...
Quote real science publications.
The footnotes are all merely references back to cr sites/”publications”.
Looking at liberals’ behavior, sometimes I believe they did come from lower forms of life and never evolved.
God created it all... and His Creation clearly includes Life and species evolving.
Humans have 50% of genes in common with bananas. Puts the other number in perspective.
Answers Research Journal 9 (2016):294–298.www.answersingenesis.org/arj/v9/101_chimpanzee_human_DNA.pdf
Jeffrey P. Tomkins, Institute for Creation Research, 1806
Royal Lane, Dallas, Texas 75229.
Abstract
The current chimpanzee genome assembly has problems that reduce its veracity as an authentic representation.
First, it has been assembled using the human genome as a reference scaffold and does not stand on its own merits. Second, given the fact that significant levels of human DNA exist in non-primate databases due to laboratory and worker contamination, the potential for human DNA in the pre-assembled chimpanzee sequencing reads is highly probable.
Therefore, 101 Sanger-style publically available trace read data sets were downloaded, end-trimmed for low quality bases, and purged of vector sequence.
Then, 25,000 sequences were selected at random from each of the 101 data sets and queried against the human genome using BLASTN v2.2.31 with gap extension.
Results from the BLASTN analysis indicated that two different groups of chimpanzee DNA sequences could be found. Those that were completed early in the chimpanzee genome project that contributed to the initial 5-fold draft genome, were considerably more similar to human than those that were produced later in the project by a difference of about 7% overall data set identity and produced 6% less hits onto the human genome.
Sequences (both alignable and non-alignable) from the seemingly less contaminated data sets indicate that the chimpanzee genome is approximately 85% identical overall to human.
Extensive poor alignment of chimpanzee DNA sequences that did not have hits on the human genome that were blasted on the chimpanzee genome revealed regions of miss-assembly for the chimpanzee genome.
Keywords: comparative genomics, human-chimp DNA similarity, human genome, chimpanzee genome, primate evolution
I’m thankful that God opened my eyes to the truth of His creation.
Common ancestor 3-6 million years ago? Never heard that in anthropology. Australopithecus was pretty far removed from the great apes, by the.
Bigger question: did the article writer read the research his article is allegedly based on, and was he able to understand it?