Bob434 post #136: "obviously- you also have a reading problem,- many species do infact have the same systems- had you read my original post about the issue correctly you would have seen that-"
Yes, it does appear that one of us has a problem with comprehension, but I still can't put my finger on exactly what that is.
Your post #91 seems very clear and straightforward to me, claiming octopus & human eyes are "homologous," not "analogous".
Now you seem to be claiming that's not what you posted, so I'm confused.
Are you now saying your post #91 is somehow in error?
what don’t you get about the fact that i do not write for that publication? I NEVER said human and octopus eyes are homologous- again-
The site is making the point, (which you failed to bold) that evolutionists have bastardized the term homology in order to fit conflicting evidences into their failed hypothesis of evolution. The classical definition of homology was simply structures that were similar are homologous- Darwin came along and arbitrarily changed the definition because he couldn’t explain common ancestry between wholly dissimilar species- But simply changing the definition doesn’t jive with scientific fact, and his new definition had several serious flaws in it- which you can read for yourself in the following link:
https://trueorigin.org/homology.php