Why are their phd’s any more fake than phd’s that believe evolution? They’re basing their conclusions off of mainstream scientists studies and conclusions. Is it still fake? Are you scared to read it because your closed mind might be opened?
“Why are their phds any more fake than phds that believe evolution? Theyre basing their conclusions off of mainstream scientists studies and conclusions. “
Because their conclusions have to agree with their inerrant bible.
“All origins research must begin with a premise.1 ICR holds that the biblical record of primeval history in Genesis 111 is factual, historical, and clearly understandable and, therefore, that all things were created and made in six literal days.”
Do you really believe the earth is older than the sun?