Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: UMCRevMom@aol.com

Wow— that is SOME letter, especially in the context that it is the 2nd letter during the run up to the FBI re-investigation... and that the materials would have been provided to the FBI by the Senate Committee so provided. Which means— there was ZERO corroboration the FBI would have obtained from the materials Ford’s attorney’s should have been GLAD to provide— but did not!

This is disbarment territory and potentially criminal charges against Bromwich, Katz and etc. Grassley is still ticked off and this should sustain the ticked off Red wave being reminded of this SCAM of a ploy to smear Judge K.


15 posted on 10/07/2018 11:25:45 AM PDT by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: John S Mosby
Wow— that is SOME letter...

I agree!

The question I would have, for any lawyers out there:

Does this letter qualify as "The Obligation to Preserve Electronic Evidence"?

Obligation to Preserve...

My hope is that this letter requires Ford, and her lawyers, to preserve all documents and that the committee follows up with subpoenas.

24 posted on 10/07/2018 11:51:00 AM PDT by FtrPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson