Skip to comments.The rape allegation against Bill Clinton, explained
Posted on 10/09/2018 10:57:22 PM PDT by Cubs Fan
Christin Ford The FBI found no corroborating evidence for Ford claims. All the people she said were at the party don't recall any party. Near the time shortly after the alleged event occurred Ford never told anyone about what she says had happened.
Juanita Broaddrick Has five corroborating witness regarding Bill Clinton's allegedly raping her--This is from Vox.com--
Several friends of Broaddrick's backed up the story. Norma Rogers, who was director of nursing at Broaddrick's nursing home at the time, told reporters that she entered the hotel room shortly after the assault allegedly took place, and "found Mrs. Broaddrick crying and in 'a state of shock.' Her upper lip was puffed out and blue, and appeared to have been hit." Kelsey elaborated to the New York Times, "She told me he forced himself on her, forced her to have intercourse."
In the Dateline show, Broaddrick's friends Louise Ma, Susan Lewis, and Jean Darden (Norma Rogers's sister) all told NBC News that Broaddrick told them Bill Clinton raped her at the time. David Broaddrick with whom Broaddrick was having an affair at the time; they both eventually left their spouses to marry each other also told NBC that Broaddrick's top lip was black after the alleged incident, and that she told him, "that she had been raped by Bill Clinton."
Broadrick also has a copy of a hospital bill and, I believe a police report
one told people right away.
one, who claimed to be at a party near the CC, didn’t even bother to run to the CC to get help. Just sashayed on home.
Neither Bill or Juanita were drunken high school teens. Bill had all the cops in the state to back him up. Juanita couldnt get help if she wanted to. There is a huge difference between being groped through clothing and being forced twice, violently, to have intercourse.
Everyone was so happy to believe Ford, though she remembered nothing about how she got there, how she got home, why she didnt get her 13 year old friend out of the party where she was violated, nothing. No corroboration at all.
Juanita had her friend in the room right after being raped, and no one cares. No one cared at all that this was our President who had violently raped this woman and she could corroborate places, times, dates, and with witnesses. No one in the media is talking about this now. And people wanted his enabler, his cover-upper, to be PRESIDENT. The leftists wanted this women-abusing couple BACK IN THE WHITE HOUSE in 2016, when they all think Kavanaugh should be taken out and shot because he copped a feel, maybe, at 17.
and this completely sidesteps Paula Jones “gropatit and dropping trou with commands to kiss-it”.
From that picture in 1978 from the nursing home with them both wearing that Clinton campaign button—Bill has tagged her with a Clinton counting coup method.
Juanita is wearing a Clinton name before Hillary Rodham uses it.
Juanita is too kind referring to Hillary as a Clinton in her book.
Well, you don’t quite have 5 witnesses, but you do have 5 people that support her, saying they were told about it real-time.
Witnesses would be people who either saw it happen, or were there immediately after it happened...such as right after the attack.
In any case, the article is fair for what it covers, but I would add a few more factors to it:
1) Did she, or her supporters, ‘time’ their accusations to damage Clinton? Answer: No.
2) Is she a raging conservative that simply hates Clinton because he’s pro-choice? Answer: No. In fact, she was a volunteer for him - meaning she really thought highly of his political views.
3) Was she ‘handled’ by conservative activists? Answer: No.
4) Did she flat-out lie about stuff, like being afraid to fly? Answer: No
In the end, this would still be a tough call, but my call would be that Bill Clinton would have no business in politics or as a judge, but there still wouldn’t be enough evidence to convict him in court.
“Juanita is too kind referring to Hillary as a Clinton in her book.”
When Bill Clinton won his first 2 year term in Arkansas, Hillary IMMEDIATELY demanded to be called “Hillary Rodman”, illustrating her disgust of marriage...yet she obviously needed it for her purposes. Two years later, Bill Clinton lost re-election, mainly because of the bitch that he was married to and the message sent by her choice of surname. Then, another 2 years later, Bill ran again, but this time his wife sucked it up and called herself Hillary Clinton, and Bill was able to win...and keep winning.
Unless she was already at home...
Mitchell actually interviewed Broaddrick, and then she and NBC then suppressed the interview while attacking Broaddrick herself! "#METOO." Right. Sure.
those were really good questions you wrote out.
You think and write well
True, very true.
I had forgotten that Hillary’s ABCNNBCBS national press corpse buried Broaderick’s story.
no police report
Don’t be absurd. Hillary Rodham Clinton, the most qualified person to ever run for Presidentonly to lose, has said that the two situations are completely different. Ford and the other women are entirely credible and must be believed, while Broaddrick and other Clinton accusers are trailer-trash bimbos. Who are we deplorables to argue with her?
Here is the story of Juanita Broaddrick so even the left can understand it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JsO_8xSB_r4
Juanita did sign an affidavit and the left uses that against her to challenge her credibility. That affidavit was prepared by Clinton fixer Bruce Lindsey and it denied the sexual assault. Why did Juanita sign it? Because they told her if she did, she would not be dragged into the Clinton impeachment inquiry and have to re-live and testify about the nightmare sexual assault. When told she would be appearing before the FBI, however, her attorney son told her she had to tell the truth to them.
I do not know the name or names of others, but Lindsey had used that affidavit trick with other women to try to keep them silence.
Same explanation with Ted Kennedy and Dead Mary Jo
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.