Posted on 10/10/2018 10:21:46 AM PDT by yesthatjallen
The Senate on Wednesday defeated a Democratic measure to overrule President Trump’s expansion of non-ObamaCare insurance plans as Democrats seek to highlight health care ahead of the midterm elections.
The Democratic measure would have overruled Trump’s expansion of short-term health insurance plans, which do not have to cover people with pre-existing conditions or cover a range of health services like mental health or prescription drugs.
It was defeated on an extremely narrow, mostly party line 50-50 vote, with Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) voting with Democrats in favor of overturning the short-term plans. Republicans argue the short-term plans simply provide a cheaper option alongside more comprehensive ObamaCare plans.
Democrats forced the vote ahead of the midterms in an attempt to put health care front and center in the campaign. Democrats said Republicans voting to keep in place these “junk” insurance plans that do not have to cover pre-existing conditions was another example they can use to paint the GOP as wrong on health care.
“In a few short weeks the American people will head to the polls where they can vote for another two years of Republican attempts to gut our health-care system, or they can vote for Democratic candidates who will safeguard the protections now in place and work to make health care more affordable,” Senate Democratic Leader Charles Schumer (N.Y.) said on the Senate floor Wednesday.
Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.), the chairman of the Senate Health Committee, forcefully pushed back, saying short-term plans provide a cheaper option than ObamaCare and if people want full ObamaCare plans with all the protections, they can still have them.
With short-term plans, Alexander said the message is “you can pay less with less coverage and at least you will have some insurance.”
“But our Democratic friends will say, ‘Oh no, we don't want to do anything that will lower the cost of insurance,’” Alexander added.
Health-care experts say the short-term plans pose a risk of siphoning healthy people away from ObamaCare plans, leading to an increase in premiums for those remaining in the ObamaCare plans.
“The rule threatens to split and weaken the individual insurance market, which has provided millions of previously uninsured people with access to quality coverage since the health care law went into effect,” a range of patient groups, including the American Cancer Society and American Heart Association, said in a joint statement this week opposing the Trump administration's short-term plans rule.
The rules that Democrats seek to overturn, which the Trump administration finalized in August, lifted a three-month restriction on short-term plans, allowing them to last up to a year. Critics say this makes the plans not really “short-term” at all.
“Our constituents deserve more options, not fewer,” Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said Wednesday. “The last thing we should do is destroy one of the options that’s still actually working for American families.”
Yes and no. Returning it to the status of a least-important issue (no government mandate, no government meddling in pricing, financing, or practice standards, you know, all the stuff that’s made it a pain in the ass) is a life or death issue.
Underline: At no time did we sexually assault her.
In most polls, health care rates as one of the lower issues that is important to most Americans.
With private, low cost pay by the month physician practices springing up all over the country, a hospital and catastrophic only policy sounds like a good idea.
I cannot stand to watch the reprehensible Chuck Schumer. He’s as slick as whale poop, and twice as dirty.
Here in Maine, the dems run a far-left, obscure moonbat female state senator no one ever heard of every time Susan Collins runs for re-election.
Collins ends up looking good in comparison, which she is not, and therefore wins re-election by a large margin.
In 2014, when Collins was last up for re-election, I wrote in the name of a local GOP businessman I know rather than vote for Collins.
In the new Senate that is seated in January, there is going to be a number of new pro-Trump senators.
The influence of Collins and Murcowski will be negated as a result.
Sounds like her family fortune and connections keeps her in office, with the open cooperation of the Dems, which is about what I figured.
Better days are coming, but not to Maine, which will remain with the Collinses in ...Dark Shadows.
And apparently Murkowski was back with us on this vote.
We need more seats so we don’t have to depend on these two.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.