Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jiggyboy
If only three other Justices wanted to entertain the possibility that the status quo could be reversed, I'd say that doesn't look good for the states.

Is it possible they saw a likely 4-4 deadlock and decided to wait until a 9th justice was added? (I don't know if they make calculations like that, but 4-4 would leave the status quo.)

14 posted on 10/12/2018 5:21:00 AM PDT by Gil4 (And the trees are all kept equal by hatchet, ax and saw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Gil4

This is just approval for the cases to be heard sometime in the future. No ruling for a long time.

Four justices must agree to have the cases before the Supreme Court. If there was not a fourth before Kavanaugh joined, it’s a bad sign.


18 posted on 10/12/2018 5:48:28 AM PDT by jjotto (Next week, BOOM!, for sure!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson