Christie-Lee McNally: Google Does Not ‘Worry About Legislation’ Because They ‘Bought’ Congress

www.breitbart.com ^ | 10/11/2018 | Robert Kraychik

[Liz]

That’s where she got the idea?

[JimRed]

If they were made to donate anonymously they wouldn’t donate at all.. At least not legally.

See, you're a quick study! I believe that Rush used to call it "Defunding the left". A few news shots of the illegal donors and recipients being perpwalked to police vehicles would greatly discourage the rest. Lobbyists could still lobby, but not on the basis of "we gave you X, now you give us Y". They'd have to demonstrate that the policy they are pushing would benefit the people, who would benefit most and what potential harm it could do and to whom.

Take the money out and much of the corruption goes away. Some will cheat, and when caught will be punished by ending up impoverished.

The only way any of this happens is if we the people demand it overwhelmingly. Sad to say, unlikely to happen.

[JimRed]

Congress was probably bought with nothing more than Google threatening to release the search history of each member of Congress.

An honest man can not be blackmailed, only falsely accused. If they're dirty, they should be OUT!

[DivineMomentsOfTruth]

I hear ya!

[Vaduz]

When in congress the more people you screw the more money you make.

[UCANSEE2]

Why not label the Ditzy Blonde Host?

Isn't that Christine Blasey-Ford ?

[UCANSEE2]

Actually, she was labeled.

Her name is DOERR. Ann Howland Doerr. WIFE of John Doerr, who is also in the picture at far middle of table.

[Paladin2]

Thanks.