Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wayne07

“+2 would be a big disappointment. This should have been the election to achieve 60, not save the bare majority.”

You’re right. With the Dims having to defend so many more Senate seats than the Rs, and the strong wind of a great economy at their back, the Rs should rout them in the Senate. A couple of Senate seat pickups for the Rs would be weak with the respective number of Senate seats each party is defending.


24 posted on 10/13/2018 5:33:42 PM PDT by SharpRightTurn (Chuck Schumer--giving pond scum everywhere a bad name.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: SharpRightTurn

Agreed, but from what I have read, the dems have been very good in arguing that if the Pubs do away with Obamacare, they will do away with insuring pre-existing conditions. This has moved the vote and apparently there has not been much of a response from the pubs. I noticed in Iowa the other night, Trump specifically said in his speech that any healthcare would include insuring pre-existing conditions. I’m not in a competitive state, but apparently there have been a lot of ads accusing the pubs of doing away with health insurance.


28 posted on 10/13/2018 5:44:12 PM PDT by Dave W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson