Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ChicagoConservative27

I suspect that not much of it actually comes from ‘small donations’, but the Dems have figured out a way to obscure the money. O’Rouke is claiming his 38 million is from ‘small donations from Texans’. REALLY?? I seriously doubt that............


2 posted on 10/16/2018 6:43:03 AM PDT by originalbuckeye ('In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act'- George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: originalbuckeye

Fools and their money are soon parted. They would be better off donating that money to charities. It will turn out that it was not money well spent.


5 posted on 10/16/2018 6:46:21 AM PDT by Russ (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: originalbuckeye

As Hillary learned, it takes more than money to win an election. :)


8 posted on 10/16/2018 6:50:03 AM PDT by cuban leaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: originalbuckeye

Money is to elections what power is to the speed of light. the faster you go, the amount of energy required to increase your speed increases exponentially (at least).

IOW, if both sides are well funded, it takes a heck of a lot more money to really make a difference. Not twice as much, but ten times as much and, often, even that isn’t enough.

If hitler had a son, how much money would it take to get him elected as leader of Israel?


10 posted on 10/16/2018 6:52:13 AM PDT by cuban leaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson