Posted on 10/16/2018 7:22:25 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Students and alumni of the Savanna College of Art and Design (SCAD) are petitioning the school to remove Supreme Court Associate Justice Clarence Thomass name from a campus building.
Created by SCAD alumna Sage Lucero, 22, the petition Take a Sexual Predators Name Off of SCADs Building has racked up more than 2,200 signatures as of Monday, and takes aim at the schools Clarence Thomas Center for Historic Preservation.
The building, Lucero told PJ Media, should be renamed after Anita Hill instead. In a Sunday interview, Lucero said she started the petition after watching Christine Blasey Ford testify against Brett Kavanaugh.
The incident became one persons word against anothers, wrote Lucero. The same situation is happening before our eyes with Dr. Ford and Brett Kavanaugh. When will we learn that a victims trauma should outweigh politics?
Since publishing the petition on October 1st, Lucero said shes seen an outpouring of support from students and concerned alumni.
"When I first put the petition out, I didn't realize how many students were already outraged over this. It's something SCAD needs to notice. It sends the wrong message out to their students. It says: you're not welcome here, Lucero told PJ Media.
"It's definitely offensive to women that go to our school, said Lucero.
To be a young women trying to pursue your dreams, and having to walk through the doors of a building with his name on it, it goes against everything SCAD stands for. This isnt political, this is about womens rights, she added.
Since publishing the petition, numerous local news crews have dropped by SCADs campus to ask students what they think of the petition. PJ Media spoke with a few supporters of the petition, but all feared retaliation from SCAD for speaking to the media.
(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...
“When will we learn that a victims trauma should outweigh politics?
When will you learn the left will lie to further their cause?
There’s no limit to these idiots!
MLK plagiarized well over 50% of his PhD thesis and regularly beat up white prostitutes.
Was he charismatic?
Yes.
I would contribute to a fund to make the Justice Thomas letters twice as big.
Well for all we know Thomas could be groping Ginsburg every time she passes out in court, she would never know the difference...
/sarc
“”...This isnt political, this is about womens rights, she added.”
...
Naming buildings is a Liberal-Progressive good deed. They get to pretend that naming a building for someone is equal to treating that person with honor.
Would that these do-gooder SJWs were so passionate about removing the name of the former Grand Kleagle of the KKK from all the buildings, etc. in West Virginia.
“They dont know near enough to be bossing anyone around.”
One could make a very convincing case that, as a cohort, college students today might well be the stupidest subset of the American population.
*might well be the stupidest subset of the American population**
One of my “things”... they, for the most part, are void of sense and have been sold a bill of fake goods. They do not know the results... the consequences of what they are esposing.. (neither to their professors/teachers and sometimes parents).. so they go headlong into stupidville... and when they are the governing powers, it’s a scary scenario!
I detest “rude”... it did not go on when I grew up.. and they are some of the rudest people.. look at the riots.. look at how they think they are going to change the situation... “in your face”.. holder, obama, maxine.. they are setting an example... unbelievable what they have done!
These are the junk brains that have propped up Nazis, Soviets, North Koreans, Cubans etc. They are not only extremely stupid, they are a very real threat to the Republic.
Punks were not even alive when this rape of Justice Thomas’ reputation was undertaken by the slime of the communist Dim party.
Anita Hill was so violated, after all!!
Thomas might have said the words “pubic hair” refering to a hair found on his drink lid.
THE HORRORS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
(P.S. as a person who grew up during that time period, there was about a year-long period of time where it was considered funny to refer to the ‘short and curlies’ or any hair as a ‘pubic hair’. Looking back it is hard to imagine that context. Put extend it back a century or so, and try to imagine how horrible it was it was to call some one a ‘rake’ or a ‘gadabout’)
If I was the administration, I’ll say Nope, not happening...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.